Literature DB >> 10663350

Differences in risk factor patterns between cervical and trochanteric hip fractures. Swedish Hip Fracture Study Group.

K Michaëlsson1, E Weiderpass, B Y Farahmand, J A Baron, P G Persson, L Zidén, C Zetterberg, S Ljunghall.   

Abstract

The two types of hip fracture--cervical and trochanteric femoral fractures--are generally considered together in etiologic studies. However, women with a trochanteric fracture may be more osteoporotic than those with cervical hip fractures, and have higher post-fracture mortality. To explore differences in risk factor patterns between the two types of hip fracture we used data from a large population-based case-control study in Swedish women, 50-81 years of age. Data were collected by questionnaire, to which more than 80% of subjects responded. Of the cases included, 811 had had a cervical fracture and 483 a trochanteric fracture during the study period; these cases were compared with 3312 randomly selected controls. Height and hormonal factors appeared to affect the risk of the two types of hip fracture differently. For every 5 cm of current height, women with a cervical fracture had an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 1.23 (95% CI 1.15-1.32) compared with an OR of 1.06 (95% CI 0.97-1.15) for women with trochanteric fractures. Later menopausal age was protective for trochanteric fractures (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0. 91-0.99 per 2 years) but no such association was found for cervical fractures. Compared with never smokers, current smokers had an OR of 1.48 (95% CI 1.12-1.95) for trochanteric fractures and 1.22 (95% CI 0.98-1.52) for cervical fractures. Current hormone replacement therapy was similarly protective for both fracture types, but former use substantially reduced risk only for trochanteric fractures: OR 0. 55 (95% CI 0.33-0.92) compared with 1.00 (95% CI 0.71-1.39) for cervical fractures. These risk factor patterns suggest etiologic differences between the fracture types which have to be considered when planning preventive interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10663350     DOI: 10.1007/s001980050259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  19 in total

1.  Effect of daily walking steps on ultrasound parameters of the calcaneus in elderly Japanese women.

Authors:  J Kitagawa; F Omasu; Y Nakahara
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-03-12       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Assessment of risk factors for second hip fractures in Japanese elderly.

Authors:  Akihiro Yamanashi; Kaoru Yamazaki; Masao Kanamori; Kuniyoshi Mochizuki; Shozo Okamoto; Youichi Koide; Kokai Kin; Akira Nagano
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-02-24       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Hip fracture risk among community-dwelling elderly people in the United States: a prospective study of physical, cognitive, and socioeconomic indicators.

Authors:  Robin Taylor Wilson; Gary A Chase; Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Robert B Wallace
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Hip fracture types in men and women change differently with age.

Authors:  David A Tanner; Marita Kloseck; Richard G Crilly; Bert Chesworth; Jason Gilliland
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 3.921

5.  Epidemiology of hip fractures in Okinawa, Japan.

Authors:  Harumi Arakaki; Ichiro Owan; Hirohisa Kudoh; Hidehiro Horizono; Kaoru Arakaki; Yasunari Ikema; Hirotaka Shinjo; Kaori Hayashi; Fuminori Kanaya
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2010-09-04       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Risk factors for hip fractures in a middle-aged population: a study of 33,000 men and women.

Authors:  Anna H Holmberg; Olof Johnell; Peter M Nilsson; Jan-Ake Nilsson; Göran Berglund; Kristina Akesson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Incidence of hip fractures in the city of Rosario, Argentina.

Authors:  Mario Morosano; Ana Masoni; Ariel Sánchez
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-04-20       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Proximal hip geometry and hip fracture risk assessment in a Korean population.

Authors:  G I Im; M J Lim
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Time trends of age-adjusted incidence rates of first hip fractures: a register-based study among older people in Viborg County, Denmark, 1987-1997.

Authors:  I M Giversen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Trochanteric soft tissue thickness and hip fracture in older men.

Authors:  Carrie M Nielson; Mary L Bouxsein; Sinara S Freitas; Kristine E Ensrud; Eric S Orwoll
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 5.958

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.