Literature DB >> 17352651

Contribution of trochanteric soft tissues to fall force estimates, the factor of risk, and prediction of hip fracture risk.

Mary L Bouxsein1, Pawel Szulc, Fracoise Munoz, Erica Thrall, Elizabeth Sornay-Rendu, Pierre D Delmas.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We compared trochanteric soft tissue thickness, femoral aBMD, and the ratio of fall force to femoral strength (i.e., factor of risk) in 21 postmenopausal women with incident hip fracture and 42 age-matched controls. Reduced trochanteric soft tissue thickness, low femoral aBMD, and increased ratio of fall force to femoral strength (i.e., factor of risk) were associated with increased risk of hip fracture.
INTRODUCTION: The contribution of trochanteric soft tissue thickness to hip fracture risk is incompletely understood. A biomechanical approach to assessing hip fracture risk that compares forces applied to the hip during a sideways fall to femoral strength may by improved by incorporating the force-attenuating effects of trochanteric soft tissues.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We determined the relationship between femoral areal BMD (aBMD) and femoral failure load in 49 human cadaveric specimens, 53-99 yr of age. We compared femoral aBMD, trochanteric soft tissue thickness, and the ratio of fall forces to bone strength (i.e., the factor of risk for hip fracture, phi), before and after accounting for the force-attenuating properties of trochanteric soft tissue in 21 postmenopausal women with incident hip fracture and 42 age-matched controls.
RESULTS: Femoral aBMD correlated strongly with femoral failure load (r2 = 0.73-0.83). Age, height, and weight did not differ; however, women with hip fracture had lower total femur aBMD (OR = 2.06; 95% CI, 1.19-3.56) and trochanteric soft tissue thickness (OR = 1.82; 95% CI, 1.01, 3.31). Incorporation of trochanteric soft tissue thickness measurements reduced the estimates of fall forces by approximately 50%. After accounting for force-attenuating properties of trochanteric soft tissue, the ratio of fall forces to femoral strength was 50% higher in cases than controls (0.92 +/- 0.44 versus 0.65 +/- 0.50, respectively; p = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to compute a biomechanically based estimate of hip fracture risk by combining estimates of femoral strength based on an empirical relationship between femoral aBMD and bone strength in cadaveric femora, along with estimates of loads applied to the hip during a sideways fall that account for thickness of trochanteric soft tissues. Our findings suggest that trochanteric soft tissue thickness may influence hip fracture risk by attenuating forces applied to the femur during a sideways fall and provide rationale for developing improved measurements of trochanteric soft tissue and for studying a larger cohort to determine whether trochanteric soft tissue thickness contributes to hip fracture risk independently of aBMD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17352651     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.070309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  64 in total

1.  Volumetric bone mineral density at the spine and hip in Chinese American and White women.

Authors:  M D Walker; I Saeed; D J McMahon; J Udesky; G Liu; T Lang; J P Bilezikian
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Obesity is not protective against fracture in postmenopausal women: GLOW.

Authors:  Juliet E Compston; Nelson B Watts; Roland Chapurlat; Cyrus Cooper; Steven Boonen; Susan Greenspan; Johannes Pfeilschifter; Stuart Silverman; Adolfo Díez-Pérez; Robert Lindsay; Kenneth G Saag; J Coen Netelenbos; Stephen Gehlbach; Frederick H Hooven; Julie Flahive; Jonathan D Adachi; Maurizio Rossini; Andrea Z Lacroix; Christian Roux; Philip N Sambrook; Ethel S Siris
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  A poisson process model for hip fracture risk.

Authors:  Zvi Schechner; Gangming Luo; Jonathan J Kaufman; Robert S Siffert
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 4.  Body composition and skeletal health: too heavy? Too thin?

Authors:  Alexander Faje; Anne Klibanski
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  Cortical and trabecular bone in the femoral neck both contribute to proximal femur failure load prediction.

Authors:  S L Manske; T Liu-Ambrose; D M L Cooper; S Kontulainen; P Guy; B B Forster; H A McKay
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Visceral fat measured by DXA is associated with increased risk of non-spine fractures in nonobese elderly women: a population-based prospective cohort analysis from the São Paulo Ageing & Health (SPAH) Study.

Authors:  L G Machado; D S Domiciano; C P Figueiredo; V F Caparbo; L Takayama; R M Oliveira; J B Lopes; P R Menezes; R M R Pereira
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Comparison of hip geometry, strength, and estimated fracture risk in women with anorexia nervosa and overweight/obese women.

Authors:  Katherine Neubecker Bachmann; Pouneh K Fazeli; Elizabeth A Lawson; Brian M Russell; Ariana D Riccio; Erinne Meenaghan; Anu V Gerweck; Kamryn Eddy; Tara Holmes; Mark Goldstein; Thomas Weigel; Seda Ebrahimi; Diane Mickley; Suzanne Gleysteen; Miriam A Bredella; Anne Klibanski; Karen K Miller
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  Effects of hip abductor muscle forces and knee boundary conditions on femoral neck stresses during simulated falls.

Authors:  W J Choi; P A Cripton; S N Robinovitch
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Does obesity really make the femur stronger? BMD, geometry, and fracture incidence in the women's health initiative-observational study.

Authors:  Thomas J Beck; Moira A Petit; Guanglin Wu; Meryl S LeBoff; Jane A Cauley; Zhao Chen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Hip Fractures Risk in Older Men and Women Associated With DXA-Derived Measures of Thigh Subcutaneous Fat Thickness, Cross-Sectional Muscle Area, and Muscle Density.

Authors:  Serghei Malkov; Peggy M Cawthon; Kathy Wilt Peters; Jane A Cauley; Rachel A Murphy; Marjolein Visser; Joseph P Wilson; Tamara Harris; Suzanne Satterfield; Steve Cummings; John A Shepherd
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 6.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.