Literature DB >> 8443696

Read my hips: measuring trochanteric soft tissue thickness.

L A Maitland1, E R Myers, J A Hipp, W C Hayes, S L Greenspan.   

Abstract

There is considerable uncertainty about which factors best predict hip fractures in the elderly. We have previously shown that a global measure of body habitus, the body mass index (BMI), is an important predictor of hip fracture in this age group. BMI may serve as a surrogate measure of trochanteric soft tissue thickness. To determine a more local assessment of trochanteric soft tissue, we compared trochanteric soft tissue thickness by ultrasound to other local measures of trochanteric soft tissue thickness (by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry [DXA] and hip circumference) and global measures of body habitus [body mass index (BMI), bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), hip/waist circumference] in 50 healthy, community-dwelling women [72 +/- 4 years old (mean +/- SD)]. Ultrasound was highly correlated with DXA trochanteric soft tissue (r2 = 0.815, P < 0.0001), hip circumference (r2 = 0.810, P < 0.0001), BMI (r2 = 0.721, P < 0.0001), and BIA (r2 = 0.743, P < 0.0001). Trochanteric soft tissue thickness measured by DXA was also significantly (P < 0.0001) correlated with BMI and BIA. We conclude that local assessments of trochanteric soft tissue thickness, including DXA and hip circumference, provide an easy and noninvasive technique to assess trochanteric soft tissue thickness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8443696     DOI: 10.1007/bf00308313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  30 in total

1.  Risk factors for falls as a cause of hip fracture in women. The Northeast Hip Fracture Study Group.

Authors:  J A Grisso; J L Kelsey; B L Strom; G Y Chiu; G Maislin; L A O'Brien; S Hoffman; F Kaplan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-05-09       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Prediction of femoral impact forces in falls on the hip.

Authors:  S N Robinovitch; W C Hayes; T A McMahon
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Anthropometric indicators and hip fracture. The NHANES I epidemiologic follow-up study.

Authors:  M E Farmer; T Harris; J H Madans; R B Wallace; J Cornoni-Huntley; L R White
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  Impaired vision and hip fracture. The Framingham Study.

Authors:  D T Felson; J J Anderson; M T Hannan; R C Milton; P W Wilson; D P Kiel
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 5.  Should perimenopausal women be screened for osteoporosis?

Authors:  S R Cummings; D Black
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 6.  Epidemiology of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  S R Cummings; J L Kelsey; M C Nevitt; K J O'Dowd
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 6.222

7.  Individual differences of ultrasound assessment of subcutaneous fat: effects of body position.

Authors:  F I Katch
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 0.553

8.  A hypothesis: the causes of hip fractures.

Authors:  S R Cummings; M C Nevitt
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1989-07

9.  Effect of age on body composition and resting metabolic rate.

Authors:  N K Fukagawa; L G Bandini; J B Young
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1990-08

10.  Hip fracture and the use of estrogens in postmenopausal women. The Framingham Study.

Authors:  D P Kiel; D T Felson; J J Anderson; P W Wilson; M A Moskowitz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-11-05       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  8 in total

1.  Effect of intervening tissues on ultrasonic backscatter measurements of bone: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Brent K Hoffmeister; P Luke Spinolo; Mark E Sellers; Peyton L Marshall; Ann M Viano; Sang-Rok Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Exercise, muscle, and the applied load-bone strength balance.

Authors:  L Giangregorio; R El-Kotob
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  The factor-of-risk biomechanical approach predicts hip fracture in men and women: the Framingham Study.

Authors:  A B Dufour; B Roberts; K E Broe; D P Kiel; M L Bouxsein; M T Hannan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Effects of loading rate on strength of the proximal femur.

Authors:  A C Courtney; E F Wachtel; E R Myers; W C Hayes
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Nutritional status and delirium in long-term care elderly individuals.

Authors:  Kennith R Culp; Pamela Z Cacchione
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.257

Review 6.  [The role of hip protectors in the prevention of hip fractures in older people].

Authors:  Lukas A Holzer; Gerold Holzer
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2007

7.  Trochanteric soft tissue thickness and hip fracture in older men.

Authors:  Carrie M Nielson; Mary L Bouxsein; Sinara S Freitas; Kristine E Ensrud; Eric S Orwoll
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  Personalised 3D Assessment of Trochanteric Soft Tissues Improves HIP Fracture Classification Accuracy.

Authors:  Alessandra Aldieri; Mara Terzini; Alberto L Audenino; Cristina Bignardi; Margaret Paggiosi; Richard Eastell; Marco Viceconti; Pinaki Bhattacharya
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.934

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.