Literature DB >> 11256892

Femoral neck and intertrochanteric fractures have different risk factors: a prospective study.

K M Fox1, S R Cummings, E Williams, K Stone.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine whether both types of hip fracture, femoral neck and intertrochanteric, have similar risk factors. A prospective cohort study was carried out on community-dwelling elderly women in four areas of the United States: Baltimore, MD; Pittsburgh, PA; Minneapolis, MN and Portland, OR. The participants were 9704 Caucasian women, 65 years and older, of whom 279 had fractured their femoral neck and 222 had fractured their trochanteric region of the proximal femur. The predictors used were the bone mass of the calcaneus and proximal femur, anthropometry, history of fracture (family and personal), medication use, functional status, physical activity and visual function. The main outcome measures were femoral neck and intertrochanteric fractures occurring during an average of 8 years of follow-up. In multivariate proportional hazards models, several risk factors increased the risk of both types of hip fracture; including femoral neck bone density and increased functional difficulty. In hazard regression models that directly compared risk factors for the two types of hip fracture, calcaneal bone mineral density (BMD) predicted femoral neck fractures more strongly than intertrochanteric fractures (OR = 1.16; 95% CI = 1.02-1.31). Steroid use and impaired functional status also predicted femoral neck fractures instead of intertrochanteric fractures. Poor health status (OR = 0.74; 95% CI = 0.55-1.00) predicted intertrochanteric fractures more strongly than femoral neck fractures. We conclude that femoral neck fractures are largely predicted by BMD and poor functional ability while aging and poor health status predispose to intertrochanteric fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11256892     DOI: 10.1007/s001980070022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  36 in total

1.  Femoral neck cortical geometry measured with magnetic resonance imaging is associated with proximal femur strength.

Authors:  S L Manske; T Liu-Ambrose; P M de Bakker; D Liu; S Kontulainen; P Guy; T R Oxland; H A McKay
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Clinical risk factors for fracture among postmenopausal patients at risk for fracture: a historical cohort study using electronic medical record data.

Authors:  Joanne LaFleur; Carrie McAdam-Marx; Stephen S Alder; Xiaoming Sheng; Carl V Asche; Jonathan Nebeker; Diana I Brixner; Stuart L Silverman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Hip fracture types in men and women change differently with age.

Authors:  David A Tanner; Marita Kloseck; Richard G Crilly; Bert Chesworth; Jason Gilliland
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 3.921

4.  Risk factors for hip fractures in a middle-aged population: a study of 33,000 men and women.

Authors:  Anna H Holmberg; Olof Johnell; Peter M Nilsson; Jan-Ake Nilsson; Göran Berglund; Kristina Akesson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Incidence and risk factors for a second hip fracture in elderly women. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures.

Authors:  R D Chapurlat; D C Bauer; M Nevitt; K Stone; S R Cummings
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-02-13       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Influence of acetabular and femoral version on fractures of the femoral neck.

Authors:  A Frost; G Pavlou; P J Richards; J Belcher; V Jasani
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Functional outcomes and mortality vary among different types of hip fractures: a function of patient characteristics.

Authors:  Roger Cornwall; Marvin S Gilbert; Kenneth J Koval; Elton Strauss; Albert L Siu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  BMD T-score discriminates trochanteric fractures from unfractured controls, whereas geometry discriminates cervical fracture cases from unfractured controls of similar BMD.

Authors:  P Pulkkinen; J Partanen; P Jalovaara; T Jämsä
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Hip fracture epidemiological trends, outcomes, and risk factors, 1970-2009.

Authors:  Ray Marks
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2010-04-08

10.  Differences in hip bone mineral density may explain the hip fracture pattern in osteoarthritic hips.

Authors:  Olof Wolf; Håkan Ström; Jan Milbrink; Sune Larsson; Hans Mallmin
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.