Literature DB >> 21344243

The factor-of-risk biomechanical approach predicts hip fracture in men and women: the Framingham Study.

A B Dufour1, B Roberts, K E Broe, D P Kiel, M L Bouxsein, M T Hannan.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: We examined the relation between a biomechanical measure, factor-of-risk, and hip fracture risk in 1,100 men and women from the Framingham Study and found that it predicted hip fracture (men, ORs of 1.8; women, 1.2-1.4).
INTRODUCTION: Alternative methods of predicting hip fracture are needed since 50% of adults who fracture do not have osteoporosis by bone mineral density (BMD) measurements. One method, factor-of-risk (Φ), computes the ratio of force on the hip in a fall to femoral strength. We examined the relation between Φ and hip fracture in 1,100 subjects from the Framingham Study with measured hip BMD, along with weight, height, and age, collected in 1988-1989.
METHODS: We estimated both peak and attenuated force applied to the hip in a sideways fall from standing height, where attenuated force incorporated cushioning effects of trochanteric soft tissue. Femoral strength was estimated from femoral neck BMD, using cadaveric femoral strength data. Sex-specific, age-adjusted survival models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals for the relation between Φ (peak), Φ (attenuated), and their components with hip fracture.
RESULTS: In 425 men and 675 women (mean age, 76 years), 136 hip fractures occurred over median follow-up of 11.3 years. Factor-of-risk, Φ, was associated with increased age-adjusted risk for hip fracture. One standard deviation increase in Φ (peak) and Φ (attenuated) was associated with HR of 1.88 and 1.78 in men and 1.23 and 1.41 in women, respectively. Examining components of Φ, in women, we found fall force and soft tissue thickness were predictive of hip fracture independent of femoral strength (was estimated from BMD).
CONCLUSIONS: Thus, both Φ (peak) and Φ (attenuated) predict hip fracture in men and women. These findings suggest additional studies of Φ predicting hip fracture using direct measurements of trochanteric soft tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21344243      PMCID: PMC3289518          DOI: 10.1007/s00198-011-1569-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  30 in total

1.  Prediction of the strength of the elderly proximal femur by bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound measurements of the heel and tibia.

Authors:  M L Bouxsein; B S Coan; S C Lee
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Epidemiological approaches to heart disease: the Framingham Study.

Authors:  T R DAWBER; G F MEADORS; F E MOORE
Journal:  Am J Public Health Nations Health       Date:  1951-03

3.  Hip impact velocities and body configurations for voluntary falls from standing height.

Authors:  A J van den Kroonenberg; W C Hayes; T A McMahon
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Hip fracture in women without osteoporosis.

Authors:  Stacey A Wainwright; Lynn M Marshall; Kristine E Ensrud; Jane A Cauley; Dennis M Black; Teresa A Hillier; Marc C Hochberg; Molly T Vogt; Eric S Orwoll
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 5.958

5.  Low BMD is less predictive than reported falls for future limb fractures in women across Europe: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  S Kaptoge; L I Benevolenskaya; A K Bhalla; J B Cannata; S Boonen; J A Falch; D Felsenberg; J D Finn; R Nuti; K Hoszowski; R Lorenc; T Miazgowski; I Jajic; G Lyritis; P Masaryk; M Naves-Diaz; G Poor; D M Reid; C Scheidt-Nave; J J Stepan; C J Todd; K Weber; A D Woolf; D K Roy; M Lunt; S R Pye; T W O'neill; A J Silman; J Reeve
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Prediction of vertebral and femoral strength in vitro by bone mineral density measured at different skeletal sites.

Authors:  X G Cheng; G Lowet; S Boonen; P H Nicholson; G Van der Perre; J Dequeker
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Assessment of the strength of proximal femur in vitro: relationship to femoral bone mineral density and femoral geometry.

Authors:  X G Cheng; G Lowet; S Boonen; P H Nicholson; P Brys; J Nijs; J Dequeker
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Force attenuation in trochanteric soft tissues during impact from a fall.

Authors:  S N Robinovitch; T A McMahon; W C Hayes
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Fall severity and bone mineral density as risk factors for hip fracture in ambulatory elderly.

Authors:  S L Greenspan; E R Myers; L A Maitland; N M Resnick; W C Hayes
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-01-12       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Fall direction, bone mineral density, and function: risk factors for hip fracture in frail nursing home elderly.

Authors:  S L Greenspan; E R Myers; D P Kiel; R A Parker; W C Hayes; N M Resnick
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.965

View more
  14 in total

1.  Trabecular Plate Loss and Deteriorating Elastic Modulus of Femoral Trabecular Bone in Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures.

Authors:  Ji Wang; Bin Zhou; Ian Parkinson; C David L Thomas; John G Clement; Nick Fazzalari; X Edward Guo
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 13.567

2.  Comparison of hip geometry, strength, and estimated fracture risk in women with anorexia nervosa and overweight/obese women.

Authors:  Katherine Neubecker Bachmann; Pouneh K Fazeli; Elizabeth A Lawson; Brian M Russell; Ariana D Riccio; Erinne Meenaghan; Anu V Gerweck; Kamryn Eddy; Tara Holmes; Mark Goldstein; Thomas Weigel; Seda Ebrahimi; Diane Mickley; Suzanne Gleysteen; Miriam A Bredella; Anne Klibanski; Karen K Miller
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 3.  Exercise, muscle, and the applied load-bone strength balance.

Authors:  L Giangregorio; R El-Kotob
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  The role of falls in fracture prediction.

Authors:  Heike A Bischoff-Ferrari
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  Parity, lactation, bone strength, and 16-year fracture risk in adult women: findings from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN).

Authors:  Takahiro Mori; Shinya Ishii; Gail A Greendale; Jane A Cauley; Kristine Ruppert; Carolyn J Crandall; Arun S Karlamangla
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 6.  Minor, major, low-trauma, and high-trauma fractures: what are the subsequent fracture risks and how do they vary?

Authors:  Amy H Warriner; Nivedita M Patkar; Huifeng Yun; Elizabeth Delzell
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 5.096

7.  Multisystem dysregulation and bone strength: findings from the study of midlife in the United States.

Authors:  Takahiro Mori; Arun S Karlamangla; Sharon Stein Merkin; Carolyn J Crandall; Neil Binkley; Gail A Greendale; Teresa E Seeman
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 8.  A biomechanical sorting of clinical risk factors affecting osteoporotic hip fracture.

Authors:  Y Luo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Physical activity as determinant of femoral neck strength relative to load in adult women: findings from the hip strength across the menopause transition study.

Authors:  T Mori; S Ishii; G A Greendale; J A Cauley; B Sternfeld; C J Crandall; W Han; A S Karlamangla
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  Fracture Prediction by Computed Tomography and Finite Element Analysis: Current and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Fjola Johannesdottir; Brett Allaire; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 5.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.