Literature DB >> 19001568

Tracking the time course of phonetic cue integration during spoken word recognition.

Bob McMurray1, Meghan A Clayards, Michael K Tanenhaus, Richard N Aslin.   

Abstract

Speech perception requires listeners to integrate multiple cues that each contribute to judgments about a phonetic category. Classic studies of trading relations assessed the weights attached to each cue but did not explore the time course of cue integration. Here, we provide the first direct evidence that asynchronous cues to voicing (/b/ vs. /p/) and manner (/b/ vs. /w/) contrasts become available to the listener at different times during spoken word recognition. Using the visual world paradigm, we show that the probability of eye movements to pictures of target and of competitor objects diverge at different points in time after the onset of the target word. These points of divergence correspond to the availability of early (voice onset time or formant transition slope) and late (vowel length) cues to voicing and manner contrasts. These results support a model of cue integration in which phonetic cues are used for lexical access as soon as they are available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19001568      PMCID: PMC2621311          DOI: 10.3758/PBR.15.6.1064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  22 in total

1.  Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Michael K Tanenhaus; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2002-12

2.  Jackknife-based method for measuring LRP onset latency differences.

Authors:  J Miller; T Patterson; R Ulrich
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Effect of speaking rate on the perceptual structure of a phonetic category.

Authors:  J L Miller; L E Volaitis
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-12

4.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Effects of speaking rate and lexical status on phonetic perception.

Authors:  J L Miller; E R Dexter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension.

Authors:  M K Tanenhaus; M J Spivey-Knowlton; K M Eberhard; J C Sedivy
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-06-16       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The influence of sentential speaking rate on the internal structure of phonetic categories.

Authors:  S C Wayland; J L Miller; L E Volaitis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The effect of subphonetic differences on lexical access.

Authors:  J E Andruski; S E Blumstein; M Burton
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1994-09

9.  Segmentation of coarticulated speech in perception.

Authors:  C A Fowler
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-10

10.  Phonetic trading relations and context effects: new experimental evidence for a speech mode of perception.

Authors:  B H Repp
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 17.737

View more
  23 in total

1.  Atypical neural responses to phonological detail in children with developmental language impairments.

Authors:  Lisa M D Archibald; Marc F Joanisse
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 6.464

2.  Individual differences in language ability are related to variation in word recognition, not speech perception: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Cheyenne Munson; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Contingent categorization in speech perception.

Authors:  Keith S Apfelbaum; Natasha Bullock-Rest; Ariane E Rhone; Allard Jongman; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.331

4.  Cue-integration and context effects in speech: evidence against speaking-rate normalization.

Authors:  Joseph C Toscano; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  The time-course of speaking rate compensation: Effects of sentential rate and vowel length on voicing judgments.

Authors:  Joseph C Toscano; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.331

6.  Finding the signal by adding noise: The role of noncontrastive phonetic variability in early word learning.

Authors:  Gwyneth C Rost; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Infancy       Date:  2010-11-01

7.  Learning During Processing: Word Learning Doesn't Wait for Word Recognition to Finish.

Authors:  Keith S Apfelbaum; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-07-29

8.  What Are You Waiting For? Real-Time Integration of Cues for Fricatives Suggests Encapsulated Auditory Memory.

Authors:  Marcus E Galle; Jamie Klein-Packard; Kayleen Schreiber; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-01

9.  The process of spoken word recognition in the face of signal degradation.

Authors:  Ashley Farris-Trimble; Bob McMurray; Nicole Cigrand; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Individual differences in online spoken word recognition: Implications for SLI.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Vicki M Samelson; Sung Hee Lee; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.