Literature DB >> 19836014

Individual differences in online spoken word recognition: Implications for SLI.

Bob McMurray1, Vicki M Samelson, Sung Hee Lee, J Bruce Tomblin.   

Abstract

Thirty years of research has uncovered the broad principles that characterize spoken word processing across listeners. However, there have been few systematic investigations of individual differences. Such an investigation could help refine models of word recognition by indicating which processing parameters are likely to vary, and could also have important implications for work on language impairment. The present study begins to fill this gap by relating individual differences in overall language ability to variation in online word recognition processes. Using the visual world paradigm, we evaluated online spoken word recognition in adolescents who varied in both basic language abilities and non-verbal cognitive abilities. Eye movements to target, cohort and rhyme objects were monitored during spoken word recognition, as an index of lexical activation. Adolescents with poor language skills showed fewer looks to the target and more fixations to the cohort and rhyme competitors. These results were compared to a number of variants of the TRACE model (McClelland & Elman, 1986) that were constructed to test a range of theoretical approaches to language impairment: impairments at sensory and phonological levels; vocabulary size, and generalized slowing. None of the existing approaches were strongly supported, and variation in lexical decay offered the best fit. Thus, basic word recognition processes like lexical decay may offer a new way to characterize processing differences in language impairment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19836014      PMCID: PMC3523704          DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  82 in total

1.  Investigating individual differences in children's real-time sentence comprehension using language-mediated eye movements.

Authors:  Kate Nation; Catherine M Marshall; Gerry T M Altmann
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2003-12

2.  Three accounts of the grammatical morpheme difficulties of English-speaking children with specific language impairment.

Authors:  L B Leonard; J A Eyer; L M Bedore; B G Grela
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  The locus of the effects of sentential-semantic context in spoken-word processing.

Authors:  P Zwitserlood
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1989-06

4.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition.

Authors:  W D Marslen-Wilson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1987-03

Review 6.  The use of grammatical morphemes reflecting aspect and modality by children with specific language impairment.

Authors:  Laurence B Leonard; Patricia Deevy; Carol A Miller; Monique Charest; Robert Kurtz; Leila Rauf
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2003-11

7.  Perception of stop consonants in children with expressive and receptive-expressive language impairments.

Authors:  R E Stark; J M Heinz
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1996-08

8.  Lexical representations in children with SLI: evidence from a frequency-manipulated gating task.

Authors:  Elina Mainela-Arnold; Julia L Evans; Jeffry A Coady
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Statistical learning of phonetic categories: insights from a computational approach.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Richard N Aslin; Joseph C Toscano
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2009-04

10.  Children with specific language impairments perceive speech most categorically when tokens are natural and meaningful.

Authors:  Jeffry A Coady; Julia L Evans; Elina Mainela-Arnold; Keith R Kluender
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  81 in total

1.  Individual differences in language ability are related to variation in word recognition, not speech perception: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Cheyenne Munson; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  The Effect of Residual Acoustic Hearing and Adaptation to Uncertainty on Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users: Evidence From Eye-Tracking.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Ashley Farris-Trimble; Michael Seedorff; Hannah Rigler
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  When words fail us: insights into language processing from developmental and acquired disorders.

Authors:  Dorothy V M Bishop; Kate Nation; Karalyn Patterson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Lexical learning and lexical processing in children with developmental language impairments.

Authors:  Kate Nation
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Developmental Timescale of Rapid Adaptation to Conflicting Cues in Real-Time Sentence Processing.

Authors:  Angele Yazbec; Michael P Kaschak; Arielle Borovsky
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-01

6.  What Are You Waiting For? Real-Time Integration of Cues for Fricatives Suggests Encapsulated Auditory Memory.

Authors:  Marcus E Galle; Jamie Klein-Packard; Kayleen Schreiber; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-01

7.  The process of spoken word recognition in the face of signal degradation.

Authors:  Ashley Farris-Trimble; Bob McMurray; Nicole Cigrand; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Vocabulary size and auditory word recognition in preschool children.

Authors:  Franzo Law; Tristan Mahr; Alissa Schneeberg; Jan Edwards
Journal:  Appl Psycholinguist       Date:  2016-05-11

9.  Lexical Processing in Toddlers with ASD: Does Weak Central Coherence Play a Role?

Authors:  Susan Ellis Weismer; Eileen Haebig; Jan Edwards; Jenny Saffran; Courtney E Venker
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2016-12

10.  Lexical activation during sentence comprehension in adolescents with history of Specific Language Impairment.

Authors:  Arielle Borovsky; Erin Burns; Jeffrey L Elman; Julia L Evans
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.