Literature DB >> 30648798

What Are You Waiting For? Real-Time Integration of Cues for Fricatives Suggests Encapsulated Auditory Memory.

Marcus E Galle1, Jamie Klein-Packard1, Kayleen Schreiber2, Bob McMurray1,3,4,5.   

Abstract

Speech unfolds over time, and the cues for even a single phoneme are rarely available simultaneously. Consequently, to recognize a single phoneme, listeners must integrate material over several hundred milliseconds. Prior work contrasts two accounts: (a) a memory buffer account in which listeners accumulate auditory information in memory and only access higher level representations (i.e., lexical representations) when sufficient information has arrived; and (b) an immediate integration scheme in which lexical representations can be partially activated on the basis of early cues and then updated when more information arises. These studies have uniformly shown evidence for immediate integration for a variety of phonetic distinctions. We attempted to extend this to fricatives, a class of speech sounds which requires not only temporal integration of asynchronous cues (the frication, followed by the formant transitions 150-350 ms later), but also integration across different frequency bands and compensation for contextual factors like coarticulation. Eye movements in the visual world paradigm showed clear evidence for a memory buffer. Results were replicated in five experiments, ruling out methodological factors and tying the release of the buffer to the onset of the vowel. These findings support a general auditory account for speech by suggesting that the acoustic nature of particular speech sounds may have large effects on how they are processed. It also has major implications for theories of auditory and speech perception by raising the possibility of an encapsulated memory buffer in early auditory processing.
© 2019 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory memory; Cue integration; Fricatives; Real-time processing; Speech perception; Spoken word recognition

Year:  2019        PMID: 30648798      PMCID: PMC6338078          DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12700

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Sci        ISSN: 0364-0213


  70 in total

1.  Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives.

Authors:  A Jongman; R Wayland; S Wong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion.

Authors:  Marc O Ernst; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-24       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Tracking the time course of word-frequency effects in auditory word recognition with event-related potentials.

Authors:  Sophie Dufour; Angèle Brunellière; Ulrich H Frauenfelder
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-11-16

4.  Sequential stream segregation of voiced and unvoiced speech sounds based on fundamental frequency.

Authors:  Marion David; Mathieu Lavandier; Nicolas Grimault; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  The time-course of speaking rate compensation: Effects of sentential rate and vowel length on voicing judgments.

Authors:  Joseph C Toscano; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.331

6.  Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access.

Authors:  S D Goldinger
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels.

Authors:  W Strange; J J Jenkins; T L Johnson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Vowel identification in mixed-speaker silent-center syllables.

Authors:  J J Jenkins; W Strange; S Miranda
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution [corrected].

Authors:  M C MacDonald; N J Pearlmutter; M S Seidenberg
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 10.  Frequency-lowering devices for managing high-frequency hearing loss: a review.

Authors:  Andrea Simpson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-06
View more
  2 in total

1.  Listeners can anticipate future segments before they identify the current one.

Authors:  Kayleen E Schreiber; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Gradient activation of speech categories facilitates listeners' recovery from lexical garden paths, but not perception of speech-in-noise.

Authors:  Efthymia C Kapnoula; Jan Edwards; Bob McMurray
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 3.077

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.