Literature DB >> 7956004

The effect of subphonetic differences on lexical access.

J E Andruski1, S E Blumstein, M Burton.   

Abstract

This study investigated whether lexical access is affected by inherent acoustic variations that contribute to the identity of a phonetic feature and ultimately a phonetic segment. Two experiments were conducted to determine whether the magnitude of semantic (associative) priming in a lexical decision task is influenced when the acoustic manifestation of the initial voiceless stop consonant (specifically, voice onset time) of a prime word semantically related to a lexical decision target was systematically manipulated (e.g., prime: "king"; target: "queen"). Results showed no effect of the acoustic manipulations at the longer interstimulus interval (250 ms); however, at the shorter interstimulus interval (50 ms), the magnitude of semantic facilitation decreased as a function of the voice onset time manipulations. In addition, there was a tendency toward slower lexical decision latencies when the prime word had a real word voiced counterpart than when it did not. These results suggest that activation levels of words in the lexicon are graded, depending on the subphonetic shape of the input word. Results also suggest that words which are phonologically similar to the intended word candidate are activated to some extent, whether the input provides a relatively poor phonetic representation of the intended word or a good one.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7956004     DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90042-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  52 in total

1.  Probabilistic constraint satisfaction at the lexical/phonetic interface: evidence for gradient effects of within-category VOT on lexical access.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Michael K Tanenhaus; Richard N Aslin; Michael J Spivey
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2003-01

2.  Decreased sensitivity to phonemic mismatch in spoken word processing in adult developmental dyslexia.

Authors:  Esther Janse; Elise de Bree; Susanne Brouwer
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2010-12

3.  Phonological Knowledge Guides Two-year-olds' and Adults' Interpretation of Salient Pitch Contours in Word Learning.

Authors:  Carolyn Quam; Daniel Swingley
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 3.059

4.  Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn; Jong Ho Won; Il Joon Moon
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Individual differences in language ability are related to variation in word recognition, not speech perception: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Cheyenne Munson; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  The Effect of Residual Acoustic Hearing and Adaptation to Uncertainty on Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users: Evidence From Eye-Tracking.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Ashley Farris-Trimble; Michael Seedorff; Hannah Rigler
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Effects of prosodically modulated sub-phonetic variation on lexical competition.

Authors:  Anne Pier Salverda; Delphine Dahan; Michael K Tanenhaus; Katherine Crosswhite; Mikhail Masharov; Joyce McDonough
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-11

8.  Evaluating the sources and functions of gradiency in phoneme categorization: An individual differences approach.

Authors:  Efthymia C Kapnoula; Matthew B Winn; Eun Jong Kong; Jan Edwards; Bob McMurray
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  What Are You Waiting For? Real-Time Integration of Cues for Fricatives Suggests Encapsulated Auditory Memory.

Authors:  Marcus E Galle; Jamie Klein-Packard; Kayleen Schreiber; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-01

10.  Spoken word recognition by eye.

Authors:  Edward T Auer
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2009-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.