Literature DB >> 25780801

The time-course of speaking rate compensation: Effects of sentential rate and vowel length on voicing judgments.

Joseph C Toscano1, Bob McMurray2.   

Abstract

Many sources of context information in speech (such as speaking rate) occur either before or after the phonetic cues they influence, yet there is little work examining the time-course of these effects. Here, we investigate how listeners compensate for preceding sentence rate and subsequent vowel length (a secondary cue that has been used as a proxy for speaking rate) when categorizing words varying in voice-onset time (VOT). Participants selected visual objects in a display while their eye-movements were recorded, allowing us to examine when each source of information had an effect on lexical processing. We found that the effect of VOT preceded that of vowel length, suggesting that each cue is used as it becomes available. In a second experiment, we found that, in contrast, the effect of preceding sentence rate occurred simultaneously with VOT, suggesting that listeners interpret VOT relative to preceding rate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  context effects; speaking rate; speech perception; spoken word recognition; visual world paradigm

Year:  2015        PMID: 25780801      PMCID: PMC4358767          DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2014.946427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 2327-3798            Impact factor:   2.331


  45 in total

1.  Temporally nonadjacent nonlinguistic sounds affect speech categorization.

Authors:  Lori L Holt
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-04

2.  Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference.

Authors:  G T Altmann; Y Kamide
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1999-12-17

3.  Speaking rate, voice-onset time, and quantity: the search for higher-order invariants for two Icelandic speech cues.

Authors:  J Pind
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-04

4.  The influence of sentential speaking rate on the internal structure of phonetic categories.

Authors:  S C Wayland; J L Miller; L E Volaitis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Perception of the duration of rapid spectrum changes in speech and nonspeech signals.

Authors:  D B Pisoni; T D Carrell; S J Gans
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-10

6.  How the components of speaking rate influence perception of phonetic segments.

Authors:  J L Miller; F Grosjean
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Phonetic trading relations and context effects: new experimental evidence for a speech mode of perception.

Authors:  B H Repp
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Gradient sensitivity to within-category variation in words and syllables.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Richard N Aslin; Michael K Tanenhaus; Michael J Spivey; Dana Subik
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Statistical learning of phonetic categories: insights from a computational approach.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Richard N Aslin; Joseph C Toscano
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2009-04

10.  Tracking the time course of phonetic cue integration during spoken word recognition.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Meghan A Clayards; Michael K Tanenhaus; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-12
View more
  8 in total

1.  Waiting for lexical access: Cochlear implants or severely degraded input lead listeners to process speech less incrementally.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Ashley Farris-Trimble; Hannah Rigler
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2017-09-14

2.  Rhythmic and speech rate effects in the perception of durational cues.

Authors:  Jeremy Steffman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Listeners can anticipate future segments before they identify the current one.

Authors:  Kayleen E Schreiber; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  Relative cue encoding in the context of sophisticated models of categorization: Separating information from categorization.

Authors:  Keith S Apfelbaum; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-08

5.  What Are You Waiting For? Real-Time Integration of Cues for Fricatives Suggests Encapsulated Auditory Memory.

Authors:  Marcus E Galle; Jamie Klein-Packard; Kayleen Schreiber; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-01

6.  Accounting for rate-dependent category boundary shifts in speech perception.

Authors:  Hans Rutger Bosker
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Encoding speech rate in challenging listening conditions: White noise and reverberation.

Authors:  Eva Reinisch; Hans Rutger Bosker
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 2.157

8.  Temporal contrast effects in human speech perception are immune to selective attention.

Authors:  Hans Rutger Bosker; Matthias J Sjerps; Eva Reinisch
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.