Literature DB >> 2971767

Effects of speaking rate and lexical status on phonetic perception.

J L Miller1, E R Dexter.   

Abstract

Among the contextual factors known to play a role in segmental perception are the rate at which the speech was produced and the lexical status of the item, that is, whether it is a meaningful word of the language. In a series of experiments on the word-initial /b/-/p/ voicing distinction, we investigated the conditions under which these factors operate during speech processing. The results indicated that under instructions of speeded responding, listeners could, on some trials, ignore some later occurring contextual information within the word that specified rate and lexical status. Importantly, however, they could not ignore speaking rate entirely. Although they could base their decision on only the early portion of the word, when doing so they treated the word as if it were physically short--that is to say, as if there were no later occurring information specifying a slower rate. This suggests that listeners always take account of rate when identifying the voicing value of a consonant, but precisely which information within the word is used to specify rate can vary with task demands.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2971767     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.14.3.369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  21 in total

1.  Resolution of lexical ambiguity by emotional tone of voice.

Authors:  Lynne C Nygaard; Erin R Lunders
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-06

2.  Naturalistic and experimental analyses of word frequency and neighborhood density effects in slips of the ear.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.500

3.  Cochlea-scaled spectral entropy predicts rate-invariant intelligibility of temporally distorted sentences.

Authors:  Christian E Stilp; Michael Kiefte; Joshua M Alexander; Keith R Kluender
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Cue-integration and context effects in speech: evidence against speaking-rate normalization.

Authors:  Joseph C Toscano; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Do postonset segments define a lexical neighborhood?

Authors:  Rochelle S Newman; James R Sawusch; Paul A Luce
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-09

6.  Subcategorical phonetic mismatches and lexical access.

Authors:  D H Whalen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-10

7.  Temporal organization of English clear and conversational speech.

Authors:  Rajka Smiljanić; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Perceptual normalization for speaking rate: effects of temporal distance.

Authors:  R S Newman; J R Sawusch
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-05

9.  Speech Rate Normalization and Phonemic Boundary Perception in Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Brittany N Jaekel; Rochelle S Newman; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  What Are You Waiting For? Real-Time Integration of Cues for Fricatives Suggests Encapsulated Auditory Memory.

Authors:  Marcus E Galle; Jamie Klein-Packard; Kayleen Schreiber; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.