Literature DB >> 25157376

Contingent categorization in speech perception.

Keith S Apfelbaum1, Natasha Bullock-Rest1, Ariane E Rhone2, Allard Jongman3, Bob McMurray4.   

Abstract

The speech signal is notoriously variable, with the same phoneme realized differently depending on factors like talker and phonetic context. Variance in the speech signal has led to a proliferation of theories of how listeners recognize speech. A promising approach, supported by computational modeling studies, is contingent categorization, wherein incoming acoustic cues are computed relative to expectations. We tested contingent encoding empirically. Listeners were asked to categorize fricatives in CV syllables constructed by splicing the fricative from one CV syllable with the vowel from another CV syllable. The two spliced syllables always contained the same fricative, providing consistent bottom-up cues; however on some trials, the vowel and/or talker mismatched between these syllables, giving conflicting contextual information. Listeners were less accurate and slower at identifying the fricatives in mismatching splices. This suggests that listeners rely on context information beyond bottom-up acoustic cues during speech perception, providing support for contingent categorization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  contingent categorization; expectation; fricatives; speech perception

Year:  2014        PMID: 25157376      PMCID: PMC4141128          DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2013.824995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 2327-3798            Impact factor:   2.331


  47 in total

1.  Perceptual parsing of acoustic consequences of velum lowering from information for vowels.

Authors:  C A Fowler; J M Brown
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-01

2.  Role of articulation in speech perception: clues from production.

Authors:  B Lindblom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science.

Authors:  Andy Clark
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 12.579

4.  On the identification of place and voicing features in synthetic stop consonants.

Authors:  James R Sawusch; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  1974-07

5.  The locus of the effects of sentential-semantic context in spoken-word processing.

Authors:  P Zwitserlood
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1989-06

6.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition.

Authors:  W D Marslen-Wilson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1987-03

8.  Acoustic invariance in speech production: evidence from measurements of the spectral characteristics of stop consonants.

Authors:  S E Blumstein; K N Stevens
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Perceptual compensation for coarticulation by Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica).

Authors:  A J Lotto; K R Kluender; L L Holt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Tracking the time course of phonetic cue integration during spoken word recognition.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Meghan A Clayards; Michael K Tanenhaus; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-12
View more
  5 in total

1.  Eye movements reveal fast, voice-specific priming.

Authors:  Megan H Papesh; Stephen D Goldinger; Michael C Hout
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2016-01-04

2.  The time-course of speaking rate compensation: Effects of sentential rate and vowel length on voicing judgments.

Authors:  Joseph C Toscano; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.331

3.  Listeners can anticipate future segments before they identify the current one.

Authors:  Kayleen E Schreiber; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  Relative cue encoding in the context of sophisticated models of categorization: Separating information from categorization.

Authors:  Keith S Apfelbaum; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-08

5.  What Comes After /f/? Prediction in Speech Derives From Data-Explanatory Processes.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Allard Jongman
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-11-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.