S P White1, J Bainbridge, E J Smith. 1. University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK. simon.white@cardiffandvale.wales.nhs.uk
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Templating of pelvic radiographs traditionally involved using implant-company provided acetates which assumed a magnification of 115-120%. With the introduction of digital imaging, many departments are becoming filmless. Templating software has been designed to allow on-screen templating of digital images. Knowledge of the true magnification of the image is required for accurate measurement. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty consecutive postoperative pelvic radiographs were analysed using templating software. The implanted component was measured using an assumed magnification factor of 115%. The template image was then reset to the known component size, and the magnification factor was adjusted until the template covered the true component. RESULTS: An assumed magnification factor of 115% oversized the acetabular component by a mean of 6 mm (three component sizes) in all 50 components. The mean true magnification in our department was 127%. CONCLUSIONS: Validation of the true magnification produced by a radiology department using templating software is a simple and reproducible technique. It is recommended to all departments using digital images and templating software. Assumption of a magnification factor of 115% risks oversizing components by 6 mm.
INTRODUCTION: Templating of pelvic radiographs traditionally involved using implant-company provided acetates which assumed a magnification of 115-120%. With the introduction of digital imaging, many departments are becoming filmless. Templating software has been designed to allow on-screen templating of digital images. Knowledge of the true magnification of the image is required for accurate measurement. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty consecutive postoperative pelvic radiographs were analysed using templating software. The implanted component was measured using an assumed magnification factor of 115%. The template image was then reset to the known component size, and the magnification factor was adjusted until the template covered the true component. RESULTS: An assumed magnification factor of 115% oversized the acetabular component by a mean of 6 mm (three component sizes) in all 50 components. The mean true magnification in our department was 127%. CONCLUSIONS: Validation of the true magnification produced by a radiology department using templating software is a simple and reproducible technique. It is recommended to all departments using digital images and templating software. Assumption of a magnification factor of 115% risks oversizing components by 6 mm.
Authors: Nuria I Olmedo-Garcia; Jose L Martínez Vergara; Tamara L Aparici Miralles; Juan V Sánchez Andrés; Adela Mesado Vives; Encarna Cruz Renovell; Vicente Granell Beltran Journal: J Orthop Date: 2018-08-24