Literature DB >> 19425665

Concurrent-vowel and tone recognitions in acoustic and simulated electric hearing.

Xin Luo1, Qian-Jie Fu.   

Abstract

Because of the poor spectral resolution in cochlear implants (CIs), fundamental frequency (F0) cues are not well preserved. Chinese-speaking CI users may have great difficulty understanding speech produced by competing talkers, due to conflicting tones. In this study, normal-hearing listeners' concurrent Chinese syllable recognition was measured with unprocessed speech and CI simulations. Concurrent syllables were constructed by summing two vowels from a male talker (with identical mean F0's) or one vowel from each of a male and a female talker (with a relatively large F0 separation). CI signal processing was simulated using four- and eight-channel noise-band vocoders; the degraded spectral resolution may limit listeners' ability to utilize talker and/or tone differences. The results showed that concurrent speech recognition was significantly poorer with the CI simulations than with unprocessed speech. There were significant interactions between the talker and speech-processing conditions, e.g., better tone and syllable recognitions with the male-female condition for unprocessed speech, and with the male-male condition for eight-channel speech. With the CI simulations, competing tones interfered with concurrent-tone and syllable recognitions, but not vowel recognition. Given limited pitch cues, subjects were unable to use F0 differences between talkers or tones for concurrent Chinese syllable recognition.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19425665      PMCID: PMC2806442          DOI: 10.1121/1.3106534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  25 in total

1.  Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.

Authors:  L M Friesen; R V Shannon; D Baskent; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Modeling the perception of concurrent vowels: vowels with different fundamental frequencies.

Authors:  P F Assmann; Q Summerfield
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Perception of concurrent vowels: effects of harmonic misalignment and pitch-period asynchrony.

Authors:  Q Summerfield; P F Assmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Streaming of vowel sequences based on fundamental frequency in a cochlear-implant simulation.

Authors:  Etienne Gaudrain; Nicolas Grimault; Eric W Healy; Jean-Christophe Béra
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Authors:  B S Wilson; C C Finley; D T Lawson; R D Wolford; D K Eddington; W M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later.

Authors:  D D Greenwood
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The role of frequency modulation in the perceptual segregation of concurrent vowels.

Authors:  J F Culling; Q Summerfield
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The perceptual segregation of simultaneous auditory signals: pulse train segregation and vowel segregation.

Authors:  M H Chalikia; A S Bregman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-11

9.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Modeling the identification of concurrent vowels with different fundamental frequencies.

Authors:  R Meddis; M J Hewitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  7 in total

1.  Rate and onset cues can improve cochlear implant synthetic vowel recognition in noise.

Authors:  Myles Mc Laughlin; Richard B Reilly; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Mandarin Tone and Vowel Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users: Effects of Talker Variability and Bimodal Hearing.

Authors:  Yi-Ping Chang; Ronald Y Chang; Chun-Yi Lin; Xin Luo
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Effects of spectral shifting on speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Tianhao Li; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 4.  Auditory implant research at the House Ear Institute 1989-2013.

Authors:  Robert V Shannon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Concurrent-vowel and tone recognition by Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Qian-Jie Fu; Hung-Pin Wu; Chuan-Jen Hsu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Using Zebra-speech to study sequential and simultaneous speech segregation in a cochlear-implant simulation.

Authors:  Etienne Gaudrain; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The P300 Auditory Event-Related Potential May Predict Segregation of Competing Speech by Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Duo-Duo Tao; Yun-Mei Zhang; Hui Liu; Wen Zhang; Min Xu; John J Galvin; Dan Zhang; Ji-Sheng Liu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 5.152

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.