Literature DB >> 10089607

Gap detection by early-deafened cochlear-implant subjects.

P A Busby1, G M Clark.   

Abstract

Two studies investigating gap-detection thresholds were conducted with cochlear-implant subjects whose onset of profound hearing loss was very early in life. The Cochlear Limited multiple-electrode prosthesis was used. The first study investigated the effects of pulse rate (200, 500, and 1000 pulses/s) and stimulus duration (500 and 1000 ms) on gap thresholds in 15 subjects. Average gap thresholds were 1.8 to 32.1 ms. There was essentially no effect of pulse rate and for almost all subjects, no effect of stimulus duration. For two subjects, performance was poorer for the 1000-ms stimulus duration. The second study investigated the relationships between gap thresholds, subject variables, and speech-perception scores. Data from the first study were combined with those from previous studies [Busby et al., Audiology 31, 95-111 (1992); Tong et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84, 951-962 (1988)], providing data from 27 subjects. A significant negative correlation was found between age at onset of deafness and gap thresholds and most variability in gap thresholds was for the congenitally deaf subjects. Significant negative correlations were found between gap thresholds and word scores for open-set Bamford-Kowal-Bench (BKB) sentences in the auditory-visual condition and lipreading enhancement scores for the same test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10089607     DOI: 10.1121/1.426721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  30 in total

Review 1.  Cochlear implants and brain stem implants.

Authors:  Richard T Ramsden
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.291

2.  Maximizing cochlear implant patients' performance with advanced speech training procedures.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 3.  Perceptual learning and auditory training in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-09

Review 4.  [Early hearing experience and sensitive developmental periods].

Authors:  A Kral
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Effects of age at onset of deafness and electrical stimulation on the developing cochlear nucleus in cats.

Authors:  Olga Stakhovskaya; Gary T Hradek; Russell L Snyder; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-05-25       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Auditory temporal acuity probed with cochlear implant stimulation and cortical recording.

Authors:  Alana E Kirby; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  The effect of temporal gap identification on speech perception by users of cochlear implants.

Authors:  Elad Sagi; Adam R Kaiser; Ted A Meyer; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Behavioral training enhances cortical temporal processing in neonatally deafened juvenile cats.

Authors:  Ralph E Beitel; Maike Vollmer; Marcia W Raggio; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Psychoacoustic and phoneme identification measures in cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Ray L Goldsworthy; Lorraine A Delhorne; Louis D Braida; Charlotte M Reed
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2013-02-21

10.  Speech recognition and temporal amplitude modulation processing by Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Qian-Jie Fu; Chao-Gang Wei; Ke-Li Cao
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.