PURPOSE: To develop and validate a free-breathing cardiac cine acquisition, with potential to simplify cardiac MR studies, provide registered slices, and increase spatial resolution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 2D free-breathing (FB) navigator-gated cine radial acquisition for cardiac function was developed that used two navigators (one placed prior to the QRS, and another 500 msec after the QRS complex, after systole) to provide complete motion-compensated assessment of systole, without loss of end-diastole. Eleven subjects were studied. RESULTS: The 2D FB method provided results visually and quantitatively similar to the 2D breath-hold (BH) methods. Comparison of volumes measured with FB to those measured by standard 2D BH cine resulted in mean bias+/-2 standard deviations of 1.0 mL+/-13.7 mL, 1.1 mL+/-7.6 mL, 3.0 g+/-18.8 g, and 0.3%+/-2.5%, for end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, left ventricular (LV) mass, and ejection fraction, respectively. Slice misregistration was identified in four (36%) of the BH studies, but none (0%) of the FB studies. In subjects with slice misregistration, there was greater discordance in LV volume measurements (P<0.05 for end-diastolic mass). CONCLUSION: The FB cine acquisition provided results qualitatively and quantitatively similar to 2D BH methods with improved slice registration. Copyright (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
PURPOSE: To develop and validate a free-breathing cardiac cine acquisition, with potential to simplify cardiac MR studies, provide registered slices, and increase spatial resolution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 2D free-breathing (FB) navigator-gated cine radial acquisition for cardiac function was developed that used two navigators (one placed prior to the QRS, and another 500 msec after the QRS complex, after systole) to provide complete motion-compensated assessment of systole, without loss of end-diastole. Eleven subjects were studied. RESULTS: The 2D FB method provided results visually and quantitatively similar to the 2D breath-hold (BH) methods. Comparison of volumes measured with FB to those measured by standard 2DBH cine resulted in mean bias+/-2 standard deviations of 1.0 mL+/-13.7 mL, 1.1 mL+/-7.6 mL, 3.0 g+/-18.8 g, and 0.3%+/-2.5%, for end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, left ventricular (LV) mass, and ejection fraction, respectively. Slice misregistration was identified in four (36%) of the BH studies, but none (0%) of the FB studies. In subjects with slice misregistration, there was greater discordance in LV volume measurements (P<0.05 for end-diastolic mass). CONCLUSION: The FB cine acquisition provided results qualitatively and quantitatively similar to 2D BH methods with improved slice registration. Copyright (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: S Plein; W H Smith; J P Ridgway; A Kassner; D J Beacock; T N Bloomer; M U Sivananthan Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Khaled Alfakih; Sven Plein; Holger Thiele; Tim Jones; John P Ridgway; Mohan U Sivananthan Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Raymond Y Kwong; Adam E Schussheim; Suresh Rekhraj; Anthony H Aletras; Nancy Geller; Janice Davis; Timothy F Christian; Robert S Balaban; Andrew E Arai Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-02-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jing Liu; Pascal Spincemaille; Noel C F Codella; Thanh D Nguyen; Martin R Prince; Yi Wang Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Abdul Haseeb Ahmed; Ruixi Zhou; Yang Yang; Prashant Nagpal; Michael Salerno; Mathews Jacob Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2020-11-30 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Khaled Z Abd-Elmoniem; Chika C Obele; Christopher T Sibley; Jatin R Matta; Roderic I Pettigrew; Ahmed M Gharib Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2011 May-Jun Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Ruixi Zhou; Yang Yang; Roshin C Mathew; John P Mugler; Daniel S Weller; Christopher M Kramer; Abdul Haseeb Ahmed; Mathews Jacob; Michael Salerno Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-04-21 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Sean M Hamlet; Christopher M Haggerty; Jonathan D Suever; Gregory J Wehner; Kristin N Andres; David K Powell; Xiaodong Zhong; Brandon K Fornwalt Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-07-26 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Ralf W Bauer; Isabel Radtke; Kai T Block; Maya C Larson; J Matthias Kerl; Renate Hammerstingl; Thomas G Graf; Thomas J Vogl; Shuo Zhang Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-01-19 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Subashini Srinivasan; Randall M Kroeker; Simon Gabriel; Adam Plotnik; Sergio R Godinez; Peng Hu; Nancy Halnon; J Paul Finn; Daniel B Ennis Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2015-10-28 Impact factor: 4.668