Literature DB >> 12566362

Detecting acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Raymond Y Kwong1, Adam E Schussheim, Suresh Rekhraj, Anthony H Aletras, Nancy Geller, Janice Davis, Timothy F Christian, Robert S Balaban, Andrew E Arai.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Managing chest pain in the emergency department remains a challenge with current diagnostic strategies. We hypothesized that cardiac MRI could accurately identify patients with possible or probable acute coronary syndrome. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The diagnostic performance of MRI was evaluated in a prospective study of 161 consecutive patients. Enrollment required 30 minutes of chest pain compatible with myocardial ischemia but an ECG not diagnostic of acute myocardial infarction. MRI was performed at rest within 12 hours of presentation and included perfusion, left ventricular function, and gadolinium-enhanced myocardial infarction detection. MRI was interpreted qualitatively but also analyzed quantitatively. The sensitivity and specificity, respectively, for detecting acute coronary syndrome were 84% and 85% by MRI, 80% and 61% by an abnormal ECG, 16% and 95% for strict ECG criteria for ischemia (ST depression or T-wave inversion), 40% and 97% for peak troponin-I, and 48% and 85% for a TIMI risk score > or =3. The MRI was more sensitive than strict ECG criteria for ischemia (P<0.001), peak troponin-I (P<0.001), and the TIMI risk score (P=0.004), and MRI was more specific than an abnormal ECG (P<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed MRI was the strongest predictor of acute coronary syndrome and added diagnostic value over clinical parameters (P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Resting cardiac MRI exhibited diagnostic operating characteristics suitable for triage of patients with chest pain in the emergency department. Performed urgently to evaluate chest pain, MRI accurately detected a high fraction of patients with acute coronary syndrome, including patients with enzyme-negative unstable angina.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12566362     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.0000047527.11221.29

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  84 in total

1.  The direct incorporation of perfusion defect information to define ischemia and infarction in a finite element model of the left ventricle.

Authors:  Alexander I Veress; George S K Fung; Taek-Soo Lee; Benjamin M W Tsui; Gregory A Kicska; W Paul Segars; Grant T Gullberg
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  T₂ -weighted MRI of post-infarct myocardial edema in mice.

Authors:  Ronald J Beyers; R Scott Smith; Yaqin Xu; Bryan A Piras; Michael Salerno; Stuart S Berr; Craig H Meyer; Christopher M Kramer; Brent A French; Frederick H Epstein
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 3.  Future prospects in magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Mark Doyle; Robert W W Biederman
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  The role of non-invasive imaging in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  C Roobottom; G Mitchell; S Iyengar
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  CMR for characterization of the myocardium in acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Erica Dall'Armellina; Theodoros D Karamitsos; Stefan Neubauer; Robin P Choudhury
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 32.419

6.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 7.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 8.  Chest pain: coronary CT in the ER.

Authors:  Erica Maffei; Sara Seitun; Andrea I Guaricci; Filippo Cademartiri
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 9.  Imaging the myocardial ischemic cascade.

Authors:  Arthur E Stillman; Matthijs Oudkerk; David A Bluemke; Menko Jan de Boer; Jens Bremerich; Ernest V Garcia; Matthias Gutberlet; Pim van der Harst; W Gregory Hundley; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Dirkjan Kuijpers; Raymond Y Kwong; Eike Nagel; Stamatios Lerakis; John Oshinski; Jean-François Paul; Riemer H J A Slart; Vinod Thourani; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Bernd J Wintersperger
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study of intravenous adult human mesenchymal stem cells (prochymal) after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Joshua M Hare; Jay H Traverse; Timothy D Henry; Nabil Dib; Robert K Strumpf; Steven P Schulman; Gary Gerstenblith; Anthony N DeMaria; Ali E Denktas; Roger S Gammon; James B Hermiller; Mark A Reisman; Gary L Schaer; Warren Sherman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 24.094

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.