Literature DB >> 18758881

Osteoporosis care at risk in the United States.

E M Lewiecki1, S Baim, E S Siris.   

Abstract

Osteoporotic fractures are associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenses. The United States (US) Surgeon General has described osteoporosis as a major public health concern that is underdiagnosed and undertreated. US federal agencies have established funding for bone density testing and put methodologies in place to monitor physician performance in the care of patients with osteoporosis. The US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has established bone density testing as a key preventive medical service and encouraged patients to have this test when first enrolling in Medicare. However, recent CMS actions have reduced reimbursement for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to levels that are below the cost of providing this service at many facilities. As a consequence, it is likely that the number of DXA facilities in the US will decrease, thereby limiting patient access to an important diagnostic service and resulting in fewer patients being diagnosed and treated to reduce fracture risk. Unless there is a reversal of continuing reimbursement cuts for DXA, it is projected that future fracture rates will increase; the cost to Medicare for fracture-related care will be far greater than the savings in the cost of DXA services and medications to reduce fracture risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18758881     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-008-0716-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  15 in total

1.  Screening for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: recommendations and rationale.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-17       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 2.  Clinical review: Clinical applications of vertebral fracture assessment by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki; Andrew J Laster
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2006-08-29       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and executive summary of the 2007 ISCD Position Development Conference.

Authors:  Sanford Baim; Neil Binkley; John P Bilezikian; David L Kendler; Didier B Hans; E Michael Lewiecki; Stuart Silverman
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2008 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.617

4.  Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025.

Authors:  Russel Burge; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Daniel H Solomon; John B Wong; Alison King; Anna Tosteson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Underdiagnosis of vertebral fractures is a worldwide problem: the IMPACT study.

Authors:  Pierre D Delmas; Lex van de Langerijt; Nelson B Watts; Richard Eastell; Harry Genant; Andreas Grauer; David L Cahall
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-12-06       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Adherence to bisphosphonate therapy and fracture rates in osteoporotic women: relationship to vertebral and nonvertebral fractures from 2 US claims databases.

Authors:  Ethel S Siris; Steven T Harris; Clifford J Rosen; Charles E Barr; James N Arvesen; Thomas A Abbott; Stuart Silverman
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.616

7.  Assessment of the clinical management of fragility fractures and implications for the new HEDIS osteoporosis measure.

Authors:  Kathleen A Foley; Shonda A Foster; Eric S Meadows; Onur Baser; Stacey R Long
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Bone mineral density measurement and treatment for osteoporosis in older individuals with fractures: a gap in evidence-based practice guideline implementation.

Authors:  Adrianne Feldstein; Patricia J Elmer; Eric Orwoll; Michael Herson; Teresa Hillier
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003-10-13

9.  Population-based study of survival after osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  C Cooper; E J Atkinson; S J Jacobsen; W M O'Fallon; L J Melton
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1993-05-01       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 10.  Precision assessment and radiation safety for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: position paper of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

Authors:  Sanford Baim; Charles R Wilson; E Michael Lewiecki; Marjorie M Luckey; Robert W Downs; Brian C Lentle
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  13 in total

1.  The effect modification of supplemental insurance on the relationship between race and bone mineral density screening in female Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Ji Won Yoo; Shunichi Nakagawa; Sulgi Kim
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2012-12

Review 2.  Osteoporosis Pathophysiology, Epidemiology, and Screening in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Giovanni Adami; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 4.592

3.  Qualitative Evaluation of Digital Hand X-rays Is Not a Reliable Method to Assess Bone Mineral Density.

Authors:  Andrew J Miller; Christopher Jones; Frederick Liss; Jack Abboudi; William Kirkpatrick; Pedro Beredjiklian
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2017-01

Review 4.  Benefits and limitations of bone mineral density and bone turnover markers to monitor patients treated for osteoporosis.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 5.  Management of osteoporosis among the elderly with other chronic medical conditions.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Curtis; Monika M Safford
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 6.  Bone densitometry and vertebral fracture assessment.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.096

7.  Effect of Medicare reimbursement reduction for imaging services on osteoporosis screening rates.

Authors:  Carrie McAdam-Marx; Sudhir Unni; Xiangyang Ye; Scott Nelson; Nancy A Nickman
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Association between circulating osteoprogenitor cell numbers and bone mineral density in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  M Pirro; C Leli; G Fabbriciani; M R Manfredelli; L Callarelli; F Bagaglia; A M Scarponi; E Mannarino
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Bone mineral density response prediction following osteoporosis treatment using machine learning to aid personalized therapy.

Authors:  Thiraphat Tanphiriyakun; Sattaya Rojanasthien; Piyapong Khumrin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Digital X-ray radiogrammetry of hand or wrist radiographs can predict hip fracture risk--a study in 5,420 women and 2,837 men.

Authors:  M L Wilczek; J Kälvesten; J Algulin; O Beiki; T B Brismar
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.