OBJECTIVES: To determine bone mineral density (BMD) testing rates and the proportion of women diagnosed after BMD screening vs an osteoporosis-related fracture before and after reductions in Medicare reimbursement for office-based imaging services in 2007, which was projected to save $2.8B over 5 years. DESIGN: Retrospective observational analysis of administrative medical claims reimbursement data. SETTING: Analysis of data from a medical claims data set. PARTICIPANTS: A cohort of 405,093 women (average age 74.1 ± 6.7) aged 65 and older with employer-sponsored Medicare supplemental coverage. MEASUREMENTS: BMD testing and the incidence of participants whose first diagnosis for osteoporosis occurred with BMD screening vs as a result of osteoporosis-related fracture were identified by calendar year. RESULTS: Thirty-eight percent of participants received one or more BMD tests during the study period. The proportion of women who received a BMD test was 12.9% in 2005, 11.4% in 2006, 11.8% in 2007, and 11.6% in 2008. Although testing rates varied, results were consistent with testing guidelines and did not decrease at a rate relative to reimbursement reductions, as had been anticipated. CONCLUSION: BMD screening rates did not substantially decline in Medicare-eligible women in the 2 years after reimbursement reductions. Meanwhile, the proportion of women diagnosed after a fracture increased, although the nature of this increase is unclear.
OBJECTIVES: To determine bone mineral density (BMD) testing rates and the proportion of women diagnosed after BMD screening vs an osteoporosis-related fracture before and after reductions in Medicare reimbursement for office-based imaging services in 2007, which was projected to save $2.8B over 5 years. DESIGN: Retrospective observational analysis of administrative medical claims reimbursement data. SETTING: Analysis of data from a medical claims data set. PARTICIPANTS: A cohort of 405,093 women (average age 74.1 ± 6.7) aged 65 and older with employer-sponsored Medicare supplemental coverage. MEASUREMENTS: BMD testing and the incidence of participants whose first diagnosis for osteoporosis occurred with BMD screening vs as a result of osteoporosis-related fracture were identified by calendar year. RESULTS: Thirty-eight percent of participants received one or more BMD tests during the study period. The proportion of women who received a BMD test was 12.9% in 2005, 11.4% in 2006, 11.8% in 2007, and 11.6% in 2008. Although testing rates varied, results were consistent with testing guidelines and did not decrease at a rate relative to reimbursement reductions, as had been anticipated. CONCLUSION: BMD screening rates did not substantially decline in Medicare-eligible women in the 2 years after reimbursement reductions. Meanwhile, the proportion of women diagnosed after a fracture increased, although the nature of this increase is unclear.
Authors: Aliya A Khan; Jacques P Brown; David L Kendler; William D Leslie; Brian C Lentle; E Michael Lewiecki; Paul D Miller; R Lawrence Nicholson; Wojciech P Olszynski; Nelson B Watts Journal: CMAJ Date: 2002-11-12 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Stephen F Hodgson; Nelson B Watts; John P Bilezikian; Bart L Clarke; T Kenney Gray; David W Harris; C Conrad Johnston; Michael Kleerekoper; Robert Lindsay; Marjorie M Luckey; Michael R McClung; Howard R Nankin; Steven M Petak; Robert R Recker Journal: Endocr Pract Date: 2003 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.443
Authors: Cynthia D O'Malley; Stephen S Johnston; Gregory Lenhart; Gregory Cherkowski; Liisa Palmer; Sarah L Morgan Journal: J Clin Densitom Date: 2011 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 2.617
Authors: Brian C Callaghan; James F Burke; Lesli E Skolarus; Ryan D Jacobson; Lindsey B De Lott; Kevin A Kerber Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2016-05-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Robert A Overman; Joel F Farley; Jeffrey R Curtis; Jie Zhang; Margaret L Gourlay; Chad L Deal Journal: J Clin Densitom Date: 2015-02-18 Impact factor: 2.617
Authors: Sarah D Berry; Elizabeth J Samelson; Michael J Pencina; Robert R McLean; L Adrienne Cupples; Kerry E Broe; Douglas P Kiel Journal: JAMA Date: 2013-09-25 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Tisheeka R Graham-Steed; Pamela R Soulos; Natalie Dearing; John Concato; Mary E Tinetti; Cary P Gross Journal: J Geriatr Oncol Date: 2014-09-18 Impact factor: 3.599
Authors: Evan L Reynolds; Kevin A Kerber; Chloe Hill; Lindsey B De Lott; Brandon Magliocco; Gregory J Esper; Brian C Callaghan Journal: Neurology Date: 2020-07-17 Impact factor: 11.800