Literature DB >> 15765173

Underdiagnosis of vertebral fractures is a worldwide problem: the IMPACT study.

Pierre D Delmas1, Lex van de Langerijt, Nelson B Watts, Richard Eastell, Harry Genant, Andreas Grauer, David L Cahall.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Accurate radiographic diagnosis of vertebral fractures is important. This multicenter, multinational study assessed radiographic diagnoses of vertebral fracture in 2451 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Comparison between local and central readings yielded a false-negative rate of 34%. Underdiagnosis of vertebral fracture is a worldwide problem.
INTRODUCTION: Vertebral fractures are the most common complication of osteoporosis. Although they are associated with significant morbidity, they frequently do not come to clinical attention. Accurate radiographic diagnosis is important.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a multicenter, multinational prospective study (the IMPACT trial), the accuracy of radiographic diagnosis of vertebral fracture was evaluated in postmenopausal women 65-80 years of age newly diagnosed with osteoporosis (based on BMD measurement). Lateral radiographs of the thoracolumbar spine were evaluated for identification of vertebral fractures, first locally and subsequently at a central reading center, using a validated semiquantitative method. False-positive and false-negative rates were calculated based on adjudicated discrepancies between the initial interpretation at the local site and the subsequent central reading, considered the "reference standard."
RESULTS: Of 2451 women with an evaluable radiograph both centrally and locally, 789 (32%) had at least one vertebral fracture. Adjudicated discrepancies (n = 350 patients) between local and central readings because of undetected vertebral fracture (68%) or equivocal terminology in the local radiology report (32%) yielded a false-negative rate of 34%.
CONCLUSIONS: Underdiagnosis of vertebral fractures was observed in all geographic regions (false-negative rates: North America, 45.2%; Latin America, 46.5%; Europe/South Africa/Australia, 29.5%). The false-positive rate was 5% globally. Underdiagnosis of vertebral fracture is a worldwide problem attributable in part to a lack of radiographic detection, use of ambiguous terminology in the radiology report, or both. Efforts to improve accuracy and reduce variability in terminology and interpretation may increase the effectiveness of spinal radiography for detecting vertebral fractures in patients with osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15765173     DOI: 10.1359/JBMR.041214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  158 in total

1.  QCT measures of bone strength at the thoracic and lumbar spine: the Framingham Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Samelson; Blaine A Christiansen; Serkalem Demissie; Kerry E Broe; Qiong Louie-Gao; L Adrienne Cupples; Benjamin J Roberts; Rajaram Manoharam; John D'Agostino; Thomas Lang; Douglas P Kiel; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 2.  New targets for intervention in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 20.543

3.  Intra-and inter-reader reliability of semi-automated quantitative morphometry measurements and vertebral fracture assessment using lateral scout views from computed tomography.

Authors:  Y M Kim; S Demissie; R Eisenberg; E J Samelson; D P Kiel; M L Bouxsein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  [Diagnosis of osteoporosis in geriatric patients - possibilities and limitations].

Authors:  Peter Mikosch
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2011-09-30

Review 5.  Role of sclerostin in bone and cartilage and its potential as a therapeutic target in bone diseases.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.346

6.  New dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry equipment in the assessment of vertebral fractures: technical limits and software accuracy.

Authors:  Alberto Bazzocchi; Danila Diano; Giuseppe Battista; Ugo Albisinni; Cristina Rossi; Giuseppe Guglielmi
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  New vertebral fractures after vertebroplasty: 2-year results from a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M P Staples; B M Howe; M D Ringler; P Mitchell; C H R Wriedt; J D Wark; P R Ebeling; R H Osborne; D F Kallmes; R Buchbinder
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 8.  Fracture Liaison Services in an open system: how was it done? what were the barriers and how were they overcome?

Authors:  Manju Chandran
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.096

9.  Effectiveness of instant vertebral assessment to detect prevalent vertebral fracture.

Authors:  R D Chapurlat; F Duboeuf; H O Marion-Audibert; B Kalpakçioglu; B H Mitlak; P D Delmas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Influence of baseline deformity definition on subsequent vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  L J Melton; D E Wenger; E J Atkinson; S J Achenbach; T H Berquist; B L Riggs; G Jiang; R Eastell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.