Literature DB >> 14557214

Bone mineral density measurement and treatment for osteoporosis in older individuals with fractures: a gap in evidence-based practice guideline implementation.

Adrianne Feldstein1, Patricia J Elmer, Eric Orwoll, Michael Herson, Teresa Hillier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis evaluation and treatment guidelines state that, because of the high risk for future fractures, a fracture in an older individual warrants initiation of pharmacological treatment or bone mineral density (BMD) measurement followed by treatment according to BMD. We compared current practice with these guidelines.
METHODS: We used the electronic data systems of a health maintenance organization to collect fracture, BMD measurement, and pharmacy data for women aged 50 to 89 years and men aged 65 to 89 years who sustained a study-defined fracture during 1998 or 1999. We determined those who had BMD measurement or pharmacological treatment for osteoporosis (bisphosphonate or estrogen) during the 2 years. We compared the evaluation and treatment data with evidence-based clinical guidelines (for women) or expert consensus (for men).
RESULTS: Of 70 513 members in the eligible age groups, 2804 persons sustained study-defined fractures. Overall, only 4.6% of those with fractures had treatment initiated after the fracture. Women sustained 80.7% of the study-defined fractures; 8.4% had BMD measurement and 42.4% received any treatment during the 2 years. Bone mineral density measurement and treatment frequency decrease significantly with age in women. In men, 1.5% had BMD measurement and 2.8% received any treatment. Approximately 51% (51.2%) of women and 95.5% of men in our study population were not evaluated or treated in accord with guideline or expert recommendations.
CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation and treatment rates for osteoporosis in older individuals with fractures fall far below national recommendations, especially for men. Intervention strategies should be developed and evaluated to prevent refracture in older individuals with fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14557214     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.163.18.2165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  69 in total

1.  The management of osteoporosis following hip fracture: how to improve our care.

Authors:  Alexander A Fisher; Michael W Davis; Marc M Budge
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Appraising osteoporosis care gaps.

Authors:  Thomas P Olenginski; Jana L Antohe; Elaine Sunderlin; Thomas M Harrington
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2011-11-20       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 3.  Polypharmacy in older adults with cancer.

Authors:  Ronald J Maggiore; Cary P Gross; Arti Hurria
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010-04-24

Review 4.  Underprescription of beneficial medicines in older people: causes, consequences and prevention.

Authors:  Antonio Cherubini; Andrea Corsonello; Fabrizia Lattanzio
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 3.923

5.  Improving osteoporosis care in high-risk home health patients through a high-intensity intervention.

Authors:  Ryan C Outman; Jeffrey R Curtis; Julie L Locher; Jeroan J Allison; Kenneth G Saag; Meredith L Kilgore
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2011-10-08       Impact factor: 2.226

6.  Using a modified nominal group technique to elicit director of nursing input for an osteoporosis intervention.

Authors:  Deborah A Levine; Kenneth G Saag; Linda L Casebeer; Cathleen Colon-Emeric; Kenneth W Lyles; Richard M Shewchuk
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2006-07-17       Impact factor: 4.669

7.  Declining Rates of Hip Fracture in End-Stage Renal Disease: Analysis From the 2003-2011 Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

Authors:  Sun Moon Kim; Sai Liu; Jin Long; Maria E Montez-Rath; Mary B Leonard; Glenn M Chertow
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  A population-based study of osteoporosis testing and treatment following introduction of a new bone densitometry service.

Authors:  William D Leslie; Leonard MacWilliam; Lisa Lix; Patricia Caetano; Gregory S Finlayson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-10-02       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 9.  Quality health care gaps in osteoporosis: how can patients, providers, and the health system do a better job?

Authors:  Gim Gee Teng; Jeffrey R Curtis; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.096

10.  Osteoporosis practice patterns in 2006 among primary care physicians participating in the NORA study.

Authors:  T W Weiss; E S Siris; E Barrett-Connor; P D Miller; C A McHorney
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.