Literature DB >> 20425086

Benefits and limitations of bone mineral density and bone turnover markers to monitor patients treated for osteoporosis.

E Michael Lewiecki1.   

Abstract

Medications are approved by regulatory agencies for treating osteoporosis when at least one randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial shows a reduction in vertebral fracture risk and the benefit-risk ratio is determined to be acceptable. Subjects who participate in registration trials are a generally homogeneous group carefully screened with strict entry criteria. Individual patients who are treated for osteoporosis in clinical practice commonly differ from subjects enrolled in these clinical trials according to confounding factors that include age, sex, comorbidities, compliance, and persistence. Because the goal of therapy is reduction of fracture risk, and this cannot be directly assessed in an individual patient, biomarkers are commonly used as surrogate end points for effectiveness. This article reviews the clinical use and abuse of the two biomarkers most commonly used to assess the effectiveness of therapy in clinical practice: bone mineral density testing and measurement of markers of bone turnover.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20425086     DOI: 10.1007/s11914-010-0004-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep        ISSN: 1544-1873            Impact factor:   5.096


  45 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework.

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Monitoring osteoporosis therapy with bone densitometry: a vital tool or regression toward mediocrity?

Authors:  S L Bonnick
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Considerations for development of surrogate endpoints for antifracture efficacy of new treatments in osteoporosis: a perspective.

Authors:  Mary L Bouxsein; Pierre D Delmas
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025.

Authors:  Russel Burge; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Daniel H Solomon; John B Wong; Alison King; Anna Tosteson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Study subjects and ordinary patients.

Authors:  R Dowd; R R Recker; R P Heaney
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Changes in bone density and turnover explain the reductions in incidence of nonvertebral fractures that occur during treatment with antiresorptive agents.

Authors:  Marc C Hochberg; Susan Greenspan; Richard D Wasnich; Paul Miller; Desmond E Thompson; Philip D Ross
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  Reduction of vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with raloxifene: results from a 3-year randomized clinical trial. Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) Investigators.

Authors:  B Ettinger; D M Black; B H Mitlak; R K Knickerbocker; T Nickelsen; H K Genant; C Christiansen; P D Delmas; J R Zanchetta; J Stakkestad; C C Glüer; K Krueger; F J Cohen; S Eckert; K E Ensrud; L V Avioli; P Lips; S R Cummings
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-08-18       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Bisphosphonates and osteoporotic fractures: a cross-design synthesis of results among compliant/persistent postmenopausal women in clinical practice versus randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  M M Wilkes; R J Navickis; W W Chan; E M Lewiecki
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Assessing response to osteoporosis therapy.

Authors:  E M Lewiecki; N B Watts
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Relationship between changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover and BMD to predict vertebral fracture risk.

Authors:  Somnath Sarkar; Jean-Yves Reginster; Gerald G Crans; Adolfo Diez-Perez; Karen V Pinette; Pierre D Delmas
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2003-12-22       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Bone turnover markers: use in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Kim Naylor; Richard Eastell
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 20.543

2.  Socioeconomic status, race, and bone turnover in the Midlife in the US Study.

Authors:  C J Crandall; D Miller-Martinez; G A Greendale; N Binkley; T E Seeman; A S Karlamangla
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Advances in bone imaging for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Judith E Adams
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 43.330

4.  Genetic variation in the serotonin transporter and HTR1B receptor predicts reduced bone formation during serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment in older adults.

Authors:  Lauren D Garfield; Daniel J Müller; James L Kennedy; Benoit H Mulsant; Charles F Reynolds; Steven L Teitelbaum; Roberto Civitelli; David Dixon; Alexandre A Todorov; Eric J Lenze
Journal:  World J Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 5.  Treatment of osteoporosis with eldecalcitol, a new vitamin D analog: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Zhixing Xu; Changchun Fan; Xuechun Zhao; Hairong Tao
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 4.162

6.  Distribution of serum βCTX in a population-based study of postmenopausal women taking into account different anti-osteoporotic therapies (the FRODOS Cohort).

Authors:  Eduardo Kanterewicz; Pilar Peris; Emma Puigoriol; Aina Yáñez; Pau Rosique; Luis Del Rio
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 7.  Bone health and associated metabolic complications in neuromuscular diseases.

Authors:  Nanette C Joyce; Lauren P Hache; Paula R Clemens
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 1.784

8.  Effects of renal tubular dysfunction on bone in tenofovir-exposed HIV-positive patients.

Authors:  Lisa Hamzah; Amanda Samarawickrama; Lucy Campbell; Matthew Pope; Keith Burling; Martin Fisher; Yvonne Gilleece; Karen Walker-Bone; Frank A Post
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 4.177

9.  Sex-related differences in bone metabolism in osteoporosis observational study.

Authors:  Kyu Hwan Choi; Jong Ho Lee; Dong Gyu Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  A collagen extraction and deuterium oxide stable isotope tracer method for the quantification of bone collagen synthesis rates in vivo.

Authors:  Rita Civil; Matthew S Brook; Kirsty J Elliott-Sale; Lívia Santos; Ian Varley; Sanna Lensu; Heikki Kainulainen; Lauren G Koch; Steven L Britton; Daniel J Wilkinson; Kenneth Smith; Craig Sale; Philip J Atherton
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2021-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.