Literature DB >> 28271081

Qualitative Evaluation of Digital Hand X-rays Is Not a Reliable Method to Assess Bone Mineral Density.

Andrew J Miller1, Christopher Jones1, Frederick Liss1, Jack Abboudi1, William Kirkpatrick1, Pedro Beredjiklian1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The gold standard for evaluating bone mineral density is dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Prior studies have shown poor reliability using analog wrist X-rays in diagnosing osteoporosis. Our goal was to investigate if there was improved diagnostic value to visual assessment of digital hand X-rays in osteoporosis screening. We hypothesized that similar to analog counterparts, digital hand X-rays have poor correlation and reliability in determining bone mineral density (BMD) relative to DEXA.
METHODS: We prospectively evaluated female patients older than 65 years who presented to our hand clinic with digital hand and wrist X-rays as part of their evaluation over six months. Patients who had a fracture and were without DEXA scans within the past two years were excluded. Five fellowship-trained hand surgeons, blinded to DEXA T-scores, evaluated the x-rays over two assessments separated by four weeks and classified them as osteoporotic, osteopenic, or normal BMD. Accuracy relative to DEXA T-score, interobserver and intraobserver rates were calculated.
RESULTS: Thirty four patients met the inclusion criteria and a total of 340 x-rays reviews were performed. The assessments were correct in 169 cases (49%) as compared to the DEXA T-scores. A mean weighted kappa coefficient of agreement between observers was 0.29 (range 0.02-0.41) reflecting a fair agreement. The first and second assessment for all five physicians was 0.46 (range 0.19-0.78) reflecting a moderate agreement. Grouping osteoporosis and osteopenia together compared to normal, the accuracy, interobserver and intraobserver rates increased to 63%, 0.42 and 0.54 respectively.
CONCLUSION: Abnormally low BMD is a common occurrence in patients treated for upper extremity disorders. There is poor accuracy relative to DEXA scan and only fair agreement in diagnosing osteoporosis using visual assessments of digital x-rays.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DEXA scan; Digital x-ray; Osteoporosis; Qualitative assessment

Year:  2017        PMID: 28271081      PMCID: PMC5339348     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg        ISSN: 2345-461X


  24 in total

1.  The radiological diagnosis of osteoporosis: a new approach.

Authors:  E BARNETT; B E NORDIN
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1960-07       Impact factor: 2.350

Review 2.  Advances in digital radiography: physical principles and system overview.

Authors:  Markus Körner; Christof H Weber; Stefan Wirth; Klaus-Jürgen Pfeifer; Maximilian F Reiser; Marcus Treitl
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  The cortical thickness of the proximal humeral diaphysis predicts bone mineral density of the proximal humerus.

Authors:  Markus J Tingart; Maria Apreleva; Dietrich von Stechow; David Zurakowski; Jon J Warner
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-05

4.  An update on the diagnosis and assessment of osteoporosis with densitometry. Committee of Scientific Advisors, International Osteoporosis Foundation.

Authors:  J A Kanis; C C Glüer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Correlation between distal radial cortical thickness and bone mineral density.

Authors:  Tracy Webber; Shaun P Patel; Michael Pensak; Olukemi Fajolu; Tamara D Rozental; Jennifer Moriatis Wolf
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.230

Review 6.  Diagnosis, screening, prevention, and treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Karen F Mauck; Bart L Clarke
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.616

7.  Assessment of osteoporosis using standard radiographs of the wrist.

Authors:  E Olschewski; P Murray; R Buckley; C Fennell; J N Powell
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2001-11

Review 8.  Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk.

Authors:  John A Kanis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  D Marshall; O Johnell; H Wedel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-05-18

10.  Proximal humerus cortical bone thickness correlates with bone mineral density and can clinically rule out osteoporosis.

Authors:  James Mather; Joy C MacDermid; Kenneth J Faber; George S Athwal
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 3.019

View more
  2 in total

1.  An Evaluation of Digital Imaging Studies in an Outpatient Orthopedic Setting.

Authors:  Kevin Lutsky; Charles Leinberry; Greg Gallant; Robert Takei; Moody Kwok; Pedro Beredjiklian
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2019-05

2.  Effect of Strength Training Protocol on Bone Mineral Density for Postmenopausal Women with Osteopenia/Osteoporosis Assessed by Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA).

Authors:  Iulian Ștefan Holubiac; Florin Valentin Leuciuc; Daniela Maria Crăciun; Tatiana Dobrescu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.576

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.