Literature DB >> 16311420

Precision assessment and radiation safety for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: position paper of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

Sanford Baim1, Charles R Wilson, E Michael Lewiecki, Marjorie M Luckey, Robert W Downs, Brian C Lentle.   

Abstract

Measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is used to diagnose osteoporosis, assess the risk of fracture, and monitor changes in BMD over time. Because biological changes in BMD are usually small in proportion to the error inherent in the test itself, interpretation of serial BMD tests depends on knowledge of the smallest change in BMD that is beyond the range of error. This value, called the least significant change (LSC), varies according to the instrument used, the patient population being tested, the measurement site, the skill of the technologist at positioning the patient and analyzing the test, and the confidence interval used in the calculation. The precision and LSC values provided by the manufacturer cannot be applied to clinical bone densitometry centers because of the differences in the patients being tested and the technologist performing the test. Because harmful errors in clinical management may occur from incorrectly interpreting serial BMD tests, it is recommended that every DXA technologist conduct a precision assessment and calculate the LSC for each measurement site and DXA instrument used. Precision assessment provides direct benefit to patients by allowing clinicians to make clinical decisions based on genuine change or stability of BMD. The patient-care benefits of precision assessment outweigh the risk of exposure to trivial doses of ionizing radiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16311420     DOI: 10.1385/jcd:8:4:371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.963


  78 in total

1.  BMD measurement and precision: a comparison of GE Lunar Prodigy and iDXA densitometers.

Authors:  Diane Krueger; Nellie Vallarta-Ast; Mary Checovich; Dessa Gemar; Neil Binkley
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.617

2.  Should all elderly women receive bisphosphonates to prevent osteoporotic fractures?

Authors: 
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2012-01

3.  American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: executive summary of recommendations.

Authors:  Nelson B Watts; John P Bilezikian; Pauline M Camacho; Susan L Greenspan; Steven T Harris; Stephen F Hodgson; Michael Kleerekoper; Marjorie M Luckey; Michael R McClung; Rachel Pessah Pollack; Steven M Petak
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.443

4.  2010 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary.

Authors:  Alexandra Papaioannou; Suzanne Morin; Angela M Cheung; Stephanie Atkinson; Jacques P Brown; Sidney Feldman; David A Hanley; Anthony Hodsman; Sophie A Jamal; Stephanie M Kaiser; Brent Kvern; Kerry Siminoski; William D Leslie
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Zoledronic acid administration failed to prevent bone loss at the knee in persons with acute spinal cord injury: an observational cohort study.

Authors:  William A Bauman; Christopher M Cirnigliaro; Michael F La Fountaine; LeighAnn Martinez; Steven C Kirshblum; Ann M Spungen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  [Antiosteoporosis medication: useful monitoring, and how long should such treatment be continued?].

Authors:  W Demary
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.372

7.  In vivo differences among scan modes in bone mineral density measurement at dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  Michele Bandirali; Luca M Sconfienza; Alberto Aliprandi; Giovanni Di Leo; Daniele Marchelli; Fabio M Ulivieri; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  Factors affecting short-term precision of musculoskeletal measures using peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT).

Authors:  R R Swinford; S J Warden
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 9.  Quantitative imaging techniques for the assessment of osteoporosis and sarcopenia.

Authors:  Sara Guerri; Daniele Mercatelli; Maria Pilar Aparisi Gómez; Alessandro Napoli; Giuseppe Battista; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Alberto Bazzocchi
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-02

10.  Navel jewelry artifacts and intravertebral variation in spine bone densitometry in adolescents and young women.

Authors:  Susan M Ott; Laura E Ichikawa; Andrea Z LaCroix; Delia Scholes
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 2.617

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.