Literature DB >> 18689892

The relationship between homozygosity and the frequency of the most frequent allele.

Noah A Rosenberg1, Mattias Jakobsson.   

Abstract

Homozygosity is a commonly used summary of allele-frequency distributions at polymorphic loci. Because high-frequency alleles contribute disproportionately to the homozygosity of a locus, it often occurs that most homozygotes are homozygous for the most frequent allele. To assess the relationship between homozygosity and the highest allele frequency at a locus, for a given homozygosity value, we determine the lower and upper bounds on the frequency of the most frequent allele. These bounds suggest tight constraints on the frequency of the most frequent allele as a function of homozygosity, differing by at most 14 and having an average difference of 23 - pi(2)/18 approximately 0.1184. The close connection between homozygosity and the frequency of the most frequent allele-which we illustrate using allele frequencies from human populations-has the consequence that when one of these two quantities is known, considerable information is available about the other quantity. This relationship also explains the similar performance of statistical tests of population-genetic models that rely on homozygosity and those that rely on the frequency of the most frequent allele, and it provides a basis for understanding the utility of extended homozygosity statistics in identifying haplotypes that have been elevated to high frequency as a result of positive selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18689892      PMCID: PMC2516077          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.084772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  15 in total

1.  Haplotype tests using coalescent simulations conditional on the number of segregating sites.

Authors:  F Depaulis; S Mousset; M Veuille
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  A standardized genetic differentiation measure.

Authors:  Philip W Hedrick
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  The homozygosity test of neutrality.

Authors:  G A Watterson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Comparisons of site- and haplotype-frequency methods for detecting positive selection.

Authors:  Kai Zeng; Shuhei Mano; Suhua Shi; Chung-I Wu
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2007-04-21       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Neutrality tests based on the distribution of haplotypes under an infinite-site model.

Authors:  F Depaulis; M Veuille
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Heterosis or neutrality?

Authors:  G A Watterson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Evidence for positive selection in the superoxide dismutase (Sod) region of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  R R Hudson; K Bailey; D Skarecky; J Kwiatowski; F J Ayala
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  A nonparametric test reveals selection for rapid flowering in the Arabidopsis genome.

Authors:  Christopher Toomajian; Tina T Hu; Maria José Aranzana; Clare Lister; Chunlao Tang; Honggang Zheng; Keyan Zhao; Peter Calabrese; Caroline Dean; Magnus Nordborg
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  A map of recent positive selection in the human genome.

Authors:  Benjamin F Voight; Sridhar Kudaravalli; Xiaoquan Wen; Jonathan K Pritchard
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  A new approach for using genome scans to detect recent positive selection in the human genome.

Authors:  Kun Tang; Kevin R Thornton; Mark Stoneking
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  12 in total

1.  The high incidence of STR D21S1446 homozygosity in Han and She populations living in South Eastern China.

Authors:  Jin-Fang Wu; Lu Xia; Yu-Xin Liu; Xin Zhang; Chen Li; Ming-Li Li
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  The number of alleles at a microsatellite defines the allele frequency spectrum and facilitates fast accurate estimation of theta.

Authors:  Ryan J Haasl; Bret A Payseur
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Mathematical Constraints on FST: Biallelic Markers in Arbitrarily Many Populations.

Authors:  Nicolas Alcala; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Upper bounds on FST in terms of the frequency of the most frequent allele and total homozygosity: the case of a specified number of alleles.

Authors:  Michael D Edge; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 1.570

5.  Enhancing the mathematical properties of new haplotype homozygosity statistics for the detection of selective sweeps.

Authors:  Nandita R Garud; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 1.570

6.  Refining the relationship between homozygosity and the frequency of the most frequent allele.

Authors:  Shashir B Reddy; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 2.259

7.  Measures of care fragmentation: Mathematical insights from population genetics.

Authors:  Noah A Rosenberg; Donna M Zulman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Bounding measures of genetic similarity and diversity using majorization.

Authors:  Alan J Aw; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 2.259

9.  Population structure in a comprehensive genomic data set on human microsatellite variation.

Authors:  Trevor J Pemberton; Michael DeGiorgio; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  The relationship between F(ST) and the frequency of the most frequent allele.

Authors:  Mattias Jakobsson; Michael D Edge; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.