Literature DB >> 25132646

Upper bounds on FST in terms of the frequency of the most frequent allele and total homozygosity: the case of a specified number of alleles.

Michael D Edge1, Noah A Rosenberg2.   

Abstract

FST is one of the most frequently-used indices of genetic differentiation among groups. Though FST takes values between 0 and 1, authors going back to Wright have noted that under many circumstances, FST is constrained to be less than 1. Recently, we showed that at a genetic locus with an unspecified number of alleles, FST for two subpopulations is strictly bounded from above by functions of both the frequency of the most frequent allele (M) and the homozygosity of the total population (HT). In the two-subpopulation case, FST can equal one only when the frequency of the most frequent allele and the total homozygosity are 1/2. Here, we extend this work by deriving strict bounds on FST for two subpopulations when the number of alleles at the locus is specified to be I. We show that restricting to I alleles produces the same upper bound on FST over much of the allowable domain for M and HT, and we derive more restrictive bounds in the windows M∈[1/I,1/(I-1)) and HT∈[1/I,I/(I(2)-1)). These results extend our understanding of the behavior of FST in relation to other population-genetic statistics.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Differentiation; Genetic diversity; Population structure; Subdivided population

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25132646      PMCID: PMC4180022          DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2014.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Popul Biol        ISSN: 0040-5809            Impact factor:   1.570


  22 in total

1.  Update to Long and Kittles's "Human genetic diversity and the nonexistence of biological races" (2003): fixation on an index.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Long
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 0.553

2.  A standardized genetic differentiation measure.

Authors:  Philip W Hedrick
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Inbreeding coefficients and coalescence times.

Authors:  M Slatkin
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  G(ST) and its relatives do not measure differentiation.

Authors:  Lou Jost
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  Effect of mutation on genetic differentiation among nonequilibrium populations.

Authors:  Nils Ryman; Olof Leimar
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  The relationship between homozygosity and the frequency of the most frequent allele.

Authors:  Noah A Rosenberg; Mattias Jakobsson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Mathematical properties of the r2 measure of linkage disequilibrium.

Authors:  Jenna M VanLiere; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2008-06-01       Impact factor: 1.570

8.  Refining the relationship between homozygosity and the frequency of the most frequent allele.

Authors:  Shashir B Reddy; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 2.259

9.  Human genetic diversity and the nonexistence of biological races.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Long; Rick A Kittles
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 0.553

Review 10.  Genetics in geographically structured populations: defining, estimating and interpreting F(ST).

Authors:  Kent E Holsinger; Bruce S Weir
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 53.242

View more
  12 in total

1.  The Relationship Between Haplotype-Based F ST and Haplotype Length.

Authors:  Rohan S Mehta; Alison F Feder; Simina M Boca; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Mathematical Constraints on FST: Biallelic Markers in Arbitrarily Many Populations.

Authors:  Nicolas Alcala; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  G ST ' , Jost's D, and FST are similarly constrained by allele frequencies: A mathematical, simulation, and empirical study.

Authors:  Nicolas Alcala; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  On the heterozygosity of an admixed population.

Authors:  Simina M Boca; Lucy Huang; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 2.259

5.  Enhancing the mathematical properties of new haplotype homozygosity statistics for the detection of selective sweeps.

Authors:  Nandita R Garud; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 1.570

6.  Enrichment analyses identify shared associations for 25 quantitative traits in over 600,000 individuals from seven diverse ancestries.

Authors:  Samuel Pattillo Smith; Sahar Shahamatdar; Wei Cheng; Selena Zhang; Joseph Paik; Misa Graff; Christopher Haiman; T C Matise; Kari E North; Ulrike Peters; Eimear Kenny; Chris Gignoux; Genevieve Wojcik; Lorin Crawford; Sohini Ramachandran
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 11.043

7.  The Effect of Balancing Selection on Population Differentiation: A Study with HLA Genes.

Authors:  Débora Y C Brandt; Jônatas César; Jérôme Goudet; Diogo Meyer
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.154

8.  Bounding measures of genetic similarity and diversity using majorization.

Authors:  Alan J Aw; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 2.259

9.  Estimating FST and kinship for arbitrary population structures.

Authors:  Alejandro Ochoa; John D Storey
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Detecting hierarchical levels of connectivity in a population of Acacia tortilis at the northern edge of the species' global distribution: Combining classical population genetics and network analyses.

Authors:  Yael S Rodger; Gili Greenbaum; Micha Silver; Shirli Bar-David; Gidon Winters
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.