Literature DB >> 8013910

Evidence for positive selection in the superoxide dismutase (Sod) region of Drosophila melanogaster.

R R Hudson1, K Bailey, D Skarecky, J Kwiatowski, F J Ayala.   

Abstract

DNA sequence variation in a 1410-bp region including the Cu,Zn Sod locus was examined in 41 homozygous lines of Drosophila melanogaster. Fourteen lines were from Barcelona, Spain, 25 were from California populations and the other two were from laboratory stocks. Two common electromorphs, SODS and SODF, are segregating in the populations. Our sample of 41 lines included 19 SodS and 22 SodF alleles (henceforward referred to as Slow and Fast alleles). All 19 Slow alleles were identical in sequence. Of the 22 Fast alleles sequenced, nine were identical in sequence and are referred to as the Fast A haplotypes. The Slow allele sequence differed from the Fast A haplotype at a single nucleotide site, the site that accounts for the amino acid difference between SODS and SODF. There were nine other haplotypes among the remaining 13 Fast alleles sequenced. The overall level of nucleotide diversity (pi) in this sample is not greatly different than that found at other loci in D. melanogaster. It is concluded that the Slow/Fast polymorphism is a recently arisen polymorphism, not an old balanced polymorphism. The large group of nearly identical haplotypes suggests that a recent mutation, at the Sod locus or tightly linked to it, has increased rapidly in frequency to around 50%, both in California and Spain. The application of a new statistical test demonstrates that the occurrence of such large numbers of haplotypes with so little variation among them is very unlikely under the usual equilibrium neutral model. We suggest that the high frequency of some haplotypes is due to natural selection at the Sod locus or at a tightly linked locus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8013910      PMCID: PMC1205914     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  37 in total

1.  Inferring the evolutionary histories of the Adh and Adh-dup loci in Drosophila melanogaster from patterns of polymorphism and divergence.

Authors:  M Kreitman; R R Hudson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Average number of nucleotide differences in a sample from a single subpopulation: a test for population subdivision.

Authors:  C Strobeck
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Drosophila simulans Cu-Zn superoxide dismutase gene sequence.

Authors:  J Kwiatowski; F González; F J Ayala
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1989-08-25       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Estimating the recombination parameter of a finite population model without selection.

Authors:  R R Hudson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 1.588

6.  Statistical methods of DNA sequence analysis: detection of intragenic recombination or gene conversion.

Authors:  J C Stephens
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations.

Authors:  Y X Fu; W H Li
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Levels of naturally occurring DNA polymorphism correlate with recombination rates in D. melanogaster.

Authors:  D J Begun; C F Aquadro
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-04-09       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila.

Authors:  J H McDonald; M Kreitman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-06-20       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The coalescent process in models with selection and recombination.

Authors:  R R Hudson; N L Kaplan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  154 in total

1.  The relationship between allozyme and chromosomal polymorphism inferred from nucleotide variation at the Acph-1 gene region of Drosophila subobscura.

Authors:  A Navarro-Sabaté; M Aguadé; C Segarra
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Allele age and a test for selection on rare alleles.

Authors:  M Slatkin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2000-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Molecular evolution of two linked genes, Est-6 and Sod, in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  E S Balakirev; E I Balakirev; F Rodríguez-Trelles; F J Ayala
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  DNA variation at the rp49 gene region of Drosophila simulans: evolutionary inferences from an unusual haplotype structure.

Authors:  J Rozas; M Gullaud; G Blandin; M Aguadé
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Gene conversion and different population histories may explain the contrast between polymorphism and linkage disequilibrium levels.

Authors:  L Frisse; R R Hudson; A Bartoszewicz; J D Wall; J Donfack; A Di Rienzo
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-08-29       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Species and recombination effects on DNA variability in the tomato genus.

Authors:  E Baudry; C Kerdelhué; H Innan; W Stephan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Evidence for recurrent paralogous gene conversion and exceptional allelic divergence in the Attacin genes of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  B P Lazzaro; A G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The genealogy of sequences containing multiple sites subject to strong selection in a subdivided population.

Authors:  Magnus Nordborg; Hideki Innan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Nucleotide variation at the CHALCONE ISOMERASE locus in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  H Kuittinen; M Aguadé
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Evidence of positive selection for a glycogen synthase (GYS1) mutation in domestic horse populations.

Authors:  Annette M McCoy; Robert Schaefer; Jessica L Petersen; Peter L Morrell; Megan A Slamka; James R Mickelson; Stephanie J Valberg; Molly E McCue
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 2.645

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.