Literature DB >> 21305294

Refining the relationship between homozygosity and the frequency of the most frequent allele.

Shashir B Reddy1, Noah A Rosenberg.   

Abstract

Recent work has established that for an arbitrary genetic locus with its number of alleles unspecified, the homozygosity of the locus confines the frequency of the most frequent allele within a narrow range, and vice versa. Here we extend beyond this limiting case by investigating the relationship between homozygosity and the frequency of the most frequent allele when the number of alleles at the locus is treated as known. Given the homozygosity of a locus with at most K alleles, we find that by taking into account the value of K, the width of the allowed range for the frequency of the most frequent allele decreases from 2/3 - π(2)/18 ≈ 0.1184 to 1/3 - 1/(3K) - {K/[3(K - 1)]} Σ(K)(k = 2) 1/k(2). We further show that properties of the relationship between homozygosity and the frequency of the most frequent allele in the unspecified-K case can be obtained from the specified-K case by taking limits as K → ∞. The results contribute to a greater understanding of the mathematical properties of fundamental statistics employed in population-genetic analysis.
© The Author(s) 2011. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21305294      PMCID: PMC3636777          DOI: 10.1007/s00285-011-0406-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Math Biol        ISSN: 0303-6812            Impact factor:   2.259


  8 in total

1.  Polyploid and multilocus extensions of the Wahlund inequality.

Authors:  Noah A Rosenberg; Peter P Calabrese
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.570

2.  Allele frequencies and the r2 measure of linkage disequilibrium: impact on design and interpretation of association studies.

Authors:  Naomi R Wray
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.587

3.  A standardized genetic differentiation measure.

Authors:  Philip W Hedrick
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  G(ST) and its relatives do not measure differentiation.

Authors:  Lou Jost
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  The relationship between homozygosity and the frequency of the most frequent allele.

Authors:  Noah A Rosenberg; Mattias Jakobsson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Mathematical properties of the r2 measure of linkage disequilibrium.

Authors:  Jenna M VanLiere; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2008-06-01       Impact factor: 1.570

7.  Human genetic diversity and the nonexistence of biological races.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Long; Rick A Kittles
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 0.553

8.  Clines, clusters, and the effect of study design on the inference of human population structure.

Authors:  Noah A Rosenberg; Saurabh Mahajan; Sohini Ramachandran; Chengfeng Zhao; Jonathan K Pritchard; Marcus W Feldman
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 5.917

  8 in total
  10 in total

1.  Mathematical Constraints on FST: Biallelic Markers in Arbitrarily Many Populations.

Authors:  Nicolas Alcala; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Upper bounds on FST in terms of the frequency of the most frequent allele and total homozygosity: the case of a specified number of alleles.

Authors:  Michael D Edge; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 1.570

3.  On the heterozygosity of an admixed population.

Authors:  Simina M Boca; Lucy Huang; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 2.259

4.  Enhancing the mathematical properties of new haplotype homozygosity statistics for the detection of selective sweeps.

Authors:  Nandita R Garud; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 1.570

5.  Measures of care fragmentation: Mathematical insights from population genetics.

Authors:  Noah A Rosenberg; Donna M Zulman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  An Unbiased Estimator of Gene Diversity with Improved Variance for Samples Containing Related and Inbred Individuals of any Ploidy.

Authors:  Alexandre M Harris; Michael DeGiorgio
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.154

7.  Bounding measures of genetic similarity and diversity using majorization.

Authors:  Alan J Aw; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 2.259

8.  Highly polymorphic mitochondrial DNA and deceiving haplotypic differentiation: implications for assessing population genetic differentiation and connectivity.

Authors:  S Fourdrilis; T Backeljau
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Population structure in a comprehensive genomic data set on human microsatellite variation.

Authors:  Trevor J Pemberton; Michael DeGiorgio; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  The relationship between F(ST) and the frequency of the most frequent allele.

Authors:  Mattias Jakobsson; Michael D Edge; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 4.562

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.