Literature DB >> 20605970

The number of alleles at a microsatellite defines the allele frequency spectrum and facilitates fast accurate estimation of theta.

Ryan J Haasl1, Bret A Payseur.   

Abstract

Theoretical work focused on microsatellite variation has produced a number of important results, including the expected distribution of repeat sizes and the expected squared difference in repeat size between two randomly selected samples. However, closed-form expressions for the sampling distribution and frequency spectrum of microsatellite variation have not been identified. Here, we use coalescent simulations of the stepwise mutation model to develop gamma and exponential approximations of the microsatellite allele frequency spectrum, a distribution central to the description of microsatellite variation across the genome. For both approximations, the parameter of biological relevance is the number of alleles at a locus, which we express as a function of θ, the population-scaled mutation rate, based on simulated data. Discovered relationships between θ, the number of alleles, and the frequency spectrum support the development of three new estimators of microsatellite θ. The three estimators exhibit roughly similar mean squared errors (MSEs) and all are biased. However, across a broad range of sample sizes and θ values, the MSEs of these estimators are frequently lower than all other estimators tested. The new estimators are also reasonably robust to mutation that includes step sizes greater than one. Finally, our approximation to the microsatellite allele frequency spectrum provides a null distribution of microsatellite variation. In this context, a preliminary analysis of the effects of demographic change on the frequency spectrum is performed. We suggest that simulations of the microsatellite frequency spectrum under evolutionary scenarios of interest may guide investigators to the use of relevant and sometimes novel summary statistics.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20605970      PMCID: PMC3299306          DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msq164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  56 in total

1.  Detecting population expansion and decline using microsatellites.

Authors:  M A Beaumont
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Maximum likelihood estimation of a migration matrix and effective population sizes in n subpopulations by using a coalescent approach.

Authors:  P Beerli; J Felsenstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Heterogeneous mutation processes in human microsatellite DNA sequences.

Authors:  H Ellegren
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  The direction of microsatellite mutations is dependent upon allele length.

Authors:  X Xu; M Peng; Z Fang
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Hitchhiking under positive Darwinian selection.

Authors:  J C Fay; C I Wu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  On the inadmissibility of Watterson's estimator.

Authors:  Andreas Futschik; Florian Gach
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 1.570

7.  The relationship between homozygosity and the frequency of the most frequent allele.

Authors:  Noah A Rosenberg; Mattias Jakobsson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Trinucleotide repeats in human genome and exome.

Authors:  Piotr Kozlowski; Mateusz de Mezer; Wlodzimierz J Krzyzosiak
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Darwinian and demographic forces affecting human protein coding genes.

Authors:  Rasmus Nielsen; Melissa J Hubisz; Ines Hellmann; Dara Torgerson; Aida M Andrés; Anders Albrechtsen; Ryan Gutenkunst; Mark D Adams; Michele Cargill; Adam Boyko; Amit Indap; Carlos D Bustamante; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Unstable tandem repeats in promoters confer transcriptional evolvability.

Authors:  Marcelo D Vinces; Matthieu Legendre; Marina Caldara; Masaki Hagihara; Kevin J Verstrepen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Substitutions Are Boring: Some Arguments about Parallel Mutations and High Mutation Rates.

Authors:  Maximilian Oliver Press; Ashley N Hall; Elizabeth A Morton; Christine Queitsch
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 11.639

2.  Estimation of the RNU2 macrosatellite mutation rate by BRCA1 mutation tracing.

Authors:  Chloé Tessereau; Yann Lesecque; Nastasia Monnet; Monique Buisson; Laure Barjhoux; Mélanie Léoné; Bingjian Feng; David E Goldgar; Olga M Sinilnikova; Sylvain Mousset; Laurent Duret; Sylvie Mazoyer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Remarkable selective constraints on exonic dinucleotide repeats.

Authors:  Ryan J Haasl; Bret A Payseur
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Evolutionary History of the Live-Bearing Endemic Allotoca diazi Species Complex (Actinopterygii, Goodeinae): Evidence of Founder Effect Events in the Mexican Pre-Hispanic Period.

Authors:  Diushi Keri Corona-Santiago; Ignacio Doadrio; Omar Domínguez-Domínguez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Clusters of incompatible genotypes evolve with limited dispersal.

Authors:  Erin L Landguth; Norman A Johnson; Samuel A Cushman
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  Quantifying separation and similarity in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae metapopulation.

Authors:  Sarah Knight; Matthew R Goddard
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 10.302

Review 7.  Challenges in analysis and interpretation of microsatellite data for population genetic studies.

Authors:  Alexander I Putman; Ignazio Carbone
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Historical Environment Is Reflected in Modern Population Genetics and Biogeography of an Island Endemic Lizard (Xantusia riversiana reticulata).

Authors:  Iris A Holmes; William J Mautz; Alison R Davis Rabosky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Spatially Heterogeneous Environmental Selection Strengthens Evolution of Reproductively Isolated Populations in a Dobzhansky-Muller System of Hybrid Incompatibility.

Authors:  Samuel A Cushman; Erin L Landguth
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 4.599

10.  Insights into the regulation of human CNV-miRNAs from the view of their target genes.

Authors:  Xudong Wu; Dinglin Zhang; Guohui Li
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.