Literature DB >> 28476869

Mathematical Constraints on FST: Biallelic Markers in Arbitrarily Many Populations.

Nicolas Alcala1, Noah A Rosenberg2.   

Abstract

[Formula: see text] is one of the most widely used statistics in population genetics. Recent mathematical studies have identified constraints that challenge interpretations of [Formula: see text] as a measure with potential to range from 0 for genetically similar populations to 1 for divergent populations. We generalize results obtained for population pairs to arbitrarily many populations, characterizing the mathematical relationship between [Formula: see text] the frequency M of the more frequent allele at a polymorphic biallelic marker, and the number of subpopulations K We show that for fixed K, [Formula: see text] has a peculiar constraint as a function of M, with a maximum of 1 only if [Formula: see text] for integers i with [Formula: see text] For fixed M, as K grows large, the range of [Formula: see text] becomes the closed or half-open unit interval. For fixed K, however, some [Formula: see text] always exists at which the upper bound on [Formula: see text] lies below [Formula: see text] We use coalescent simulations to show that under weak migration, [Formula: see text] depends strongly on M when K is small, but not when K is large. Finally, examining data on human genetic variation, we use our results to explain the generally smaller [Formula: see text] values between pairs of continents relative to global [Formula: see text] values. We discuss implications for the interpretation and use of [Formula: see text].
Copyright © 2017 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FST; allele frequency; genetic differentiation; migration; population structure

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28476869      PMCID: PMC5500152          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.116.199141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  47 in total

1.  A human genome diversity cell line panel.

Authors:  Howard M Cann; Claudia de Toma; Lucien Cazes; Marie-Fernande Legrand; Valerie Morel; Laurence Piouffre; Julia Bodmer; Walter F Bodmer; Batsheva Bonne-Tamir; Anne Cambon-Thomsen; Zhu Chen; J Chu; Carlo Carcassi; Licinio Contu; Ruofu Du; Laurent Excoffier; G B Ferrara; Jonathan S Friedlaender; Helena Groot; David Gurwitz; Trefor Jenkins; Rene J Herrera; Xiaoyi Huang; Judith Kidd; Kenneth K Kidd; Andre Langaney; Alice A Lin; S Qasim Mehdi; Peter Parham; Alberto Piazza; Maria Pia Pistillo; Yaping Qian; Qunfang Shu; Jiujin Xu; S Zhu; James L Weber; Henry T Greely; Marcus W Feldman; Gilles Thomas; Jean Dausset; L Luca Cavalli-Sforza
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-04-12       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Genetic structure of human populations.

Authors:  Noah A Rosenberg; Jonathan K Pritchard; James L Weber; Howard M Cann; Kenneth K Kidd; Lev A Zhivotovsky; Marcus W Feldman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-12-20       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  A haplotype map of the human genome.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Genetic structure of European sheep breeds.

Authors:  L-J Lawson Handley; K Byrne; F Santucci; S Townsend; M Taylor; M W Bruford; G M Hewitt
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 5.  Q(ST)-F(ST) comparisons: evolutionary and ecological insights from genomic heterogeneity.

Authors:  Tuomas Leinonen; R J Scott McCairns; Robert B O'Hara; Juha Merilä
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Upper bounds on FST in terms of the frequency of the most frequent allele and total homozygosity: the case of a specified number of alleles.

Authors:  Michael D Edge; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 1.570

7.  Estimation of fixation indices and gene diversities.

Authors:  M Nei; R K Chesser
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 1.670

8.  Refining the relationship between homozygosity and the frequency of the most frequent allele.

Authors:  Shashir B Reddy; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 2.259

Review 9.  Genetics in geographically structured populations: defining, estimating and interpreting F(ST).

Authors:  Kent E Holsinger; Bruce S Weir
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 53.242

10.  An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes.

Authors:  Goncalo R Abecasis; Adam Auton; Lisa D Brooks; Mark A DePristo; Richard M Durbin; Robert E Handsaker; Hyun Min Kang; Gabor T Marth; Gil A McVean
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  13 in total

1.  The Relationship Between Haplotype-Based F ST and Haplotype Length.

Authors:  Rohan S Mehta; Alison F Feder; Simina M Boca; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  G ST ' , Jost's D, and FST are similarly constrained by allele frequencies: A mathematical, simulation, and empirical study.

Authors:  Nicolas Alcala; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  On the heterozygosity of an admixed population.

Authors:  Simina M Boca; Lucy Huang; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 2.259

4.  Receding ice drove parallel expansions in Southern Ocean penguins.

Authors:  Theresa L Cole; Ludovic Dutoit; Nicolas Dussex; Tom Hart; Alana Alexander; Jane L Younger; Gemma V Clucas; María José Frugone; Yves Cherel; Richard Cuthbert; Ursula Ellenberg; Steven R Fiddaman; Johanna Hiscock; David Houston; Pierre Jouventin; Thomas Mattern; Gary Miller; Colin Miskelly; Paul Nolan; Michael J Polito; Petra Quillfeldt; Peter G Ryan; Adrian Smith; Alan J D Tennyson; David Thompson; Barbara Wienecke; Juliana A Vianna; Jonathan M Waters
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Mathematical Properties of Linkage Disequilibrium Statistics Defined by Normalization of the Coefficient D = pAB - pApB.

Authors:  Jonathan T L Kang; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 0.444

6.  The Effect of Balancing Selection on Population Differentiation: A Study with HLA Genes.

Authors:  Débora Y C Brandt; Jônatas César; Jérôme Goudet; Diogo Meyer
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.154

7.  Evolution of flowering time in a selfing annual plant: Roles of adaptation and genetic drift.

Authors:  Laurène Gay; Julien Dhinaut; Margaux Jullien; Renaud Vitalis; Miguel Navascués; Vincent Ranwez; Joëlle Ronfort
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Allele frequency divergence reveals ubiquitous influence of positive selection in Drosophila.

Authors:  Jason Bertram
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Detecting steps in spatial genetic data: Which diversity measures are best?

Authors:  Alexander T Sentinella; Angela T Moles; Jason G Bragg; Maurizio Rossetto; William B Sherwin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Genome-wide SNPs resolve spatiotemporal patterns of connectivity within striped marlin (Kajikia audax), a broadly distributed and highly migratory pelagic species.

Authors:  Nadya R Mamoozadeh; John E Graves; Jan R McDowell
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 5.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.