Literature DB >> 16329237

A standardized genetic differentiation measure.

Philip W Hedrick1.   

Abstract

Interpretation of genetic differentiation values is often problematic because of their dependence on the level of genetic variation. For example, the maximum level of GST is less than the average within population homozygosity so that for highly variable loci, even when no alleles are shared between subpopulations, GST may be low. To remedy this difficulty, a standardized measure of genetic differentiation is introduced here, one which has the same range, 0-1, for all levels of genetic variation. With this measure, the magnitude is the proportion of the maximum differentiation possible for the level of subpopulation homozygosity observed. This is particularly important for situations in which the mutation rate is of the same magnitude or higher than the rate of gene flow. The standardized measure allows comparison between loci with different levels of genetic variation, such as allozymes and microsatellite loci, or mtDNA and Y-chromosome genes, and for genetic differentiation for organisms with different effective population sizes.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16329237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  354 in total

1.  Analytical methods for immunogenetic population data.

Authors:  Steven J Mack; Pierre-Antoine Gourraud; Richard M Single; Glenys Thomson; Jill A Hollenbach
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2012

2.  The evolutionary history of the allopolyploid Squalius alburnoides (Cyprinidae) complex in the northern Iberian Peninsula.

Authors:  C Cunha; I Doadrio; J Abrantes; M M Coelho
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Exploring neutral and adaptive processes in expanding populations of gilthead sea bream, Sparus aurata L., in the North-East Atlantic.

Authors:  I Coscia; E Vogiatzi; G Kotoulas; C S Tsigenopoulos; S Mariani
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 4.  Recombination rate variation and speciation: theoretical predictions and empirical results from rabbits and mice.

Authors:  Michael W Nachman; Bret A Payseur
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Population divergence and gene flow in an endangered and highly mobile seabird.

Authors:  A J Welch; R C Fleischer; H F James; A E Wiley; P H Ostrom; J Adams; F Duvall; N Holmes; D Hu; J Penniman; K A Swindle
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Divergent evolution of molecular markers during laboratory adaptation in Drosophila subobscura.

Authors:  Pedro Simões; Marta Pascual; Maria Manuela Coelho; Margarida Matos
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 1.082

7.  Genetic structure and contrasting selection pattern at two major histocompatibility complex genes in wild house mouse populations.

Authors:  D Cížková; J Gouy de Bellocq; S J E Baird; J Piálek; J Bryja
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Homogeneous genetic structure and variation in tree architecture of Larix kaempferi along altitudinal gradients on Mt. Fuji.

Authors:  Masao Nishimura; Hiroaki Setoguchi
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2010-08-14       Impact factor: 2.629

9.  Genotypic and environmental variation in specific leaf area in a widespread Alpine plant after transplantation to different altitudes.

Authors:  J F Scheepens; Eva S Frei; Jürg Stöcklin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Molecular Characterization of the Indigenous Stingless Bees (Tetragonula spp. Complex) Using ISSR Marker from Southern Peninsular India.

Authors:  P P Nayak; J Prakash
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 1.434

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.