Literature DB >> 2243755

On the perception of speech from time-varying acoustic information: contributions of amplitude variation.

R Remez1, P E Rubin.   

Abstract

The cyclic variation in the energy envelope of the speech signal results from the production of speech in syllables. This acoustic property is often identified as a source of information in the perception of syllable attributes, though spectral variation can also provide this information reliably. In the present study of the relative contributions of the energy and spectral envelopes in speech perception, we employed sinusoidal replicas of utterances, which permitted us to examine the roles of these acoustic properties in establishing or maintaining time-varying perceptual coherence. Three experiments were carried out to assess the independent perceptual effects of variation in sinusoidal amplitude and frequency, using sentence-length signals. In Experiment 1, we found that the fine grain of amplitude variation was not necessary for the perception of segmental and suprasegmental linguistic attributes; in Experiment 2, we found that amplitude was nonetheless effective in influencing syllable perception, and that in some circumstances it was crucial to segmental perception; in Experiment 3, we observed that coarse-grain amplitude variation, above all, proved to be extremely important in phonetic perception. We conclude that in perceiving sinusoidal replicas, the perceiver derives much from following the coherent pattern of frequency variation and gross signal energy, but probably derives rather little from tracking the precise details of the energy envelope. These findings encourage the view that the perceiver uses time-varying acoustic properties selectively in understanding speech.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2243755     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206682

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  15 in total

1.  Descriptive analysis of the acoustic aspects of speech.

Authors:  C G FANT
Journal:  Logos       Date:  1962-04

2.  Articulation testing methods.

Authors:  J P EGAN
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1948-09       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Discovering phonetic coherence in acoustic patterns.

Authors:  C T Best; M Studdert-Kennedy; S Manuel; J Rubin-Spitz
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-03

4.  Perceptual normalization of vowels produced by sinusoidal voices.

Authors:  R E Remez; P E Rubin; L C Nygaard; W A Howell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  The stream of speech.

Authors:  R E Remez; P E Rubin
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  1983

6.  Information in speech: observations on the perception of [s]-stop clusters.

Authors:  P J Bailey; Q Summerfield
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Hearing "words" without words: prosodic cues for word perception.

Authors:  L H Nakatani; J A Schaffer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Sonority and syllabicity: acoustic correlates of perception.

Authors:  P J Price
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.759

9.  Speech perception without traditional speech cues.

Authors:  R E Remez; P E Rubin; D B Pisoni; T D Carrell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-05-22       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Perceptual equivalence of two acoustic cues for stop-consonant manner.

Authors:  H L Fitch; T Halwes; D M Erickson; A M Liberman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-04
View more
  8 in total

1.  The effect of amplitude comodulation on auditory object formation in sentence perception.

Authors:  T D Carrell; J M Opie
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-10

2.  Perceptual restoration of a "missing" speech sound: auditory induction or illusion?

Authors:  B H Repp
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-01

3.  The intelligibility of noise-vocoded speech: spectral information available from across-channel comparison of amplitude envelopes.

Authors:  Brian Roberts; Robert J Summers; Peter J Bailey
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Perceptual coherence in listeners having longstanding childhood hearing losses, listeners with adult-onset hearing losses, and listeners with normal hearing.

Authors:  Andrea Pittman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Speech identification based on temporal fine structure cues.

Authors:  Stanley Sheft; Marine Ardoint; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Limits on phonetic integration in duplex perception.

Authors:  D H Whalen; A M Liberman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-08

7.  Use of speech-modulated noise adds strong "bottom-up" cues for phonemic restoration.

Authors:  J A Bashford; R M Warren; C A Brown
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-04

8.  AUDITORY-PHONETIC PROJECTION AND LEXICAL STRUCTURE IN THE RECOGNITION OF SINE-WAVE WORDS.

Authors:  Robert E Remez; Kathryn R Dubowski; Robin S Broder; Morgana L Davids; Yael S Grossman; Marina Moskalenko; Jennifer S Pardo; Sara Maria Hasbun
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 3.332

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.