Literature DB >> 20058988

On the importance of preserving the harmonics and neighboring partials prior to vocoder processing: implications for cochlear implants.

Yi Hu1, Philipos C Loizou.   

Abstract

Pre-processing based noise-reduction algorithms used for cochlear implants (CIs) can sometimes introduce distortions which are carried through the vocoder stages of CI processing. While the background noise may be notably suppressed, the harmonic structure and/or spectral envelope of the signal may be distorted. The present study investigates the potential of preserving the signal's harmonic structure in voiced segments (e.g., vowels) as a means of alleviating the negative effects of pre-processing. The hypothesis tested is that preserving the harmonic structure of the signal is crucial for subsequent vocoder processing. The implications of preserving either the main harmonic components occurring at multiples of F0 or the main harmonics along with adjacent partials are investigated. This is done by first pre-processing noisy speech with a conventional noise-reduction algorithm, regenerating the harmonics, and vocoder processing the stimuli with eight channels of stimulation in steady speech-shaped noise. Results indicated that preserving the main low-frequency harmonics (spanning 1 or 3 kHz) alone was not beneficial. Preserving, however, the harmonic structure of the stimulus, i.e., the main harmonics along with the adjacent partials, was found to be critically important and provided substantial improvements (41 percentage points) in intelligibility.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20058988      PMCID: PMC2821170          DOI: 10.1121/1.3266682

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  19 in total

1.  Effects of noise and noise suppression on speech perception by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  I Hochberg; A Boothroyd; M Weiss; S Hellman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Spectral subtraction-based speech enhancement for cochlear implant patients in background noise.

Authors:  Li-Ping Yang; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Subspace algorithms for noise reduction in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Philipos C Loizou; Arthur Lobo; Yi Hu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Subjective comparison and evaluation of speech enhancement algorithms.

Authors:  Yi Hu; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.017

5.  Use of a sigmoidal-shaped function for noise attenuation in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Yi Hu; Philipos C Loizou; Ning Li; Kalyan Kasturi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Using blind source separation techniques to improve speech recognition in bilateral cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Kostas Kokkinakis; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  A "rationalized" arcsine transform.

Authors:  G A Studebaker
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1985-09

9.  Evaluation of a portable two-microphone adaptive beamforming speech processor with cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  R J van Hoesel; G M Clark
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The contribution of obstruent consonants and acoustic landmarks to speech recognition in noise.

Authors:  Ning Li; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effects of introducing low-frequency harmonics in the perception of vocoded telephone speech.

Authors:  Yi Hu; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A simulation study of harmonics regeneration in noise reduction for electric and acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Yi Hu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Speech enhancement for cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Dongmei Wang; John H L Hansen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.840

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.