Literature DB >> 18626790

Imagining the future of photoacoustic mammography.

Simone van der Burg1.   

Abstract

How can a realistic ethical imagination about the future of a technology take shape? This article contains a reflection which is based on the experiences of an embedded ethicist in the context of biophysical research conducive to the development of photoacoustic mammography, which is intended for the non-invasive detection of breast cancer. Imagination in this context already informs the activities of the biophysical researchers, but its role is limited: biophysical future scenarios concentrate on the technological advances that photoacoustics could bring about. In this article it is argued that it is advisable to also consider the medical practice and the ways in which this practice is likely to change as an effect of the introduction of photoacoustic mammography into it. On the basis of this more encompassing imaginative endeavor it is possible to get a clearer idea about how new technologies are able to contribute to human well being, which is informative for the setting of research-goals/priorities and a responsible implementation of new technologies into the world.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18626790     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-008-9079-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  22 in total

1.  Populist instead of professional.

Authors:  N Wald
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.136

Review 2.  Non-invasive in vivo characterization of breast tumors using photon migration spectroscopy.

Authors:  B J Tromberg; N Shah; R Lanning; A Cerussi; J Espinoza; T Pham; L Svaasand; J Butler
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2000 Jan-Apr       Impact factor: 5.715

3.  Interpretation of the breast screening trials: a commentary on the recent paper by Gøtzsche and Olsen.

Authors:  S W Duffy
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.380

4.  Frequency-domain techniques enhance optical mammography: initial clinical results.

Authors:  M A Franceschini; K T Moesta; S Fantini; G Gaida; E Gratton; H Jess; W W Mantulin; M Seeber; P M Schlag; M Kaschke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-06-10       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography.

Authors:  O Olsen; P C Gøtzsche
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-10-20       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable?

Authors:  P C Gøtzsche; O Olsen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-01-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  The Canadian National Breast Screening Study: a perspective on criticisms.

Authors:  C J Baines
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1994-02-15       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  The Canadian National Breast Screening Study: update on breast cancer mortality.

Authors:  A B Miller; T To; C J Baines; C Wall
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1997

9.  Development of a time-domain optical mammograph and first in vivo applications.

Authors:  D Grosenick; H Wabnitz; H H Rinneberg; K T Moesta; P M Schlag
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1999-05-01       Impact factor: 1.980

10.  Initial results of in vivo non-invasive cancer imaging in the human breast using near-infrared photoacoustics.

Authors:  Srirang Manohar; Susanne E Vaartjes; Johan C G van Hespen; Joost M Klaase; Frank M van den Engh; Wiendelt Steenbergen; Ton G van Leeuwen
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 3.894

View more
  13 in total

1.  Ethicist as designer: a pragmatic approach to ethics in the lab.

Authors:  Aimee van Wynsberghe; Scott Robbins
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Parallel, embedded or just part of the team: ethicists cooperating within a European security research project.

Authors:  A van Gorp; S van der Molen
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  The why and how of enabling the integration of social and ethical aspects in research and development.

Authors:  Steven M Flipse; Maarten C A van der Sanden; Patricia Osseweijer
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Midstream modulation in biotechnology industry: redefining what is 'part of the job' of researchers in industry.

Authors:  Steven M Flipse; Maarten C A van der Sanden; Patricia Osseweijer
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Setting up spaces for collaboration in industry between researchers from the natural and social sciences.

Authors:  Steven M Flipse; Maarten C A van der Sanden; Patricia Osseweijer
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  The DNA of socially responsible innovation: Social and natural scientists need to establish mutual understanding and a common language to efficiently work together.

Authors:  Steven M Flipse; Maarten C A van der Sanden; Maud Radstake; Johannes H De Winde; Patricia Osseweijer
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 7.  Definitions and Conceptual Dimensions of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Mirjam Burget; Emanuele Bardone; Margus Pedaste
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  Multidisciplinary Engagement with Nanoethics Through Education-The Nanobio-RAISE Advanced Courses as a Case Study and Model.

Authors:  Daan Schuurbiers; Susanne Sleenhoff; Johannes F Jacobs; Patricia Osseweijer
Journal:  Nanoethics       Date:  2009-11-21       Impact factor: 0.917

9.  A procedural approach to distributing responsibilities in R&D networks.

Authors:  Neelke Doorn
Journal:  Poiesis Prax       Date:  2010-09-16

10.  A Rawlsian approach to distribute responsibilities in networks.

Authors:  Neelke Doorn
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 3.525

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.