Literature DB >> 8291826

The Canadian National Breast Screening Study: a perspective on criticisms.

C J Baines1.   

Abstract

Recently published 7-year results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study (NBSS) generated much controversy and criticism. In women aged 40 to 49 years at entry, no reduction in breast cancer mortality was observed when screened women were compared with virtually unscreened women. In women aged 50 to 59 years, breast cancer mortality was similar when annual screening with mammography and physical examination was compared with annual screening with physical examination alone. Although NBSS results in 40- to 49-year-old women are similar to those from previously published screening studies, critics have attacked the study's design, randomization, execution, mammography, follow-up procedures, contamination of controls, and analysis. The absence of benefit observed in mammographically screened women who were 50 to 59 years old has been used to support criticism of mammography. Important facts have been ignored. The NBSS controls, aged 50 to 59 years, unlike in other studies, received thorough annual physical examinations. Cancer detection rates in both age groups were higher in the mammography than the comparison groups. Screen and interval cancer detection rates, sensitivity and specificity estimates, and prevalence to incidence ratios at first screen met or exceeded standards established by other screening studies. Claims that randomization was flawed, in particular, that more symptomatic women were assigned to mammography, are not supported by the distribution of descriptive variables collected before randomization was done. As for the "contamination" of 26% of controls aged 40 to 49 years, who reported receiving mammography, it is improbable that single or occasional diagnostic mammograms in one quarter of the control group could obliterate the benefit of four or five annual mammograms in almost 100% of the mammography group. Much remains unknown about the efficacy of breast screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8291826     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-120-4-199402150-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  11 in total

1.  When statistics provide unsatisfying answers: revisiting the breast self-examination controversy.

Authors:  Barron H Lerner
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-01-22       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Imagining the future of photoacoustic mammography.

Authors:  Simone van der Burg
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 3.  The mammography and prostate-specific antigen controversies: implications for patient-physician encounters and public policy.

Authors:  A S Brett
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Most breast cancer screening trials have a flawed design.

Authors:  Nishant Gurnani; Anurag Srivastava
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 0.656

5.  Effect of breast self-examination techniques on the risk of death from breast cancer.

Authors:  B J Harvey; A B Miller; C J Baines; P N Corey
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-11-01       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  How Did CNBSS Influence Guidelines for So Long and What Can That Teach Us?

Authors:  Shushiela Appavoo
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 3.109

7.  The limitations of breast cancer screening for first-degree relatives of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  A I Neugut; J S Jacobson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Assessing the amount of unscheduled screening ("contamination") in the control arm of the UK "Age" Trial.

Authors:  Nicola Kingston; Iyamide Thomas; Louise Johns; Sue Moss
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 9.  Screening for breast cancer with mammography.

Authors:  Peter C Gøtzsche; Karsten Juhl Jørgensen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-06-04

10.  Rational and irrational issues in breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Cornelia J Baines
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.