Literature DB >> 27090147

Definitions and Conceptual Dimensions of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Literature Review.

Mirjam Burget1, Emanuele Bardone2, Margus Pedaste2.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to provide a discussion on the definitions and conceptual dimensions of Responsible Research and Innovation based on findings from the literature. In the study, the outcomes of a literature review of 235 RRI-related articles were presented. The articles were selected from the EBSCO and Google Scholar databases regarding the definitions and dimensions of RRI. The results of the study indicated that while administrative definitions were widely quoted in the reviewed literature, they were not substantially further elaborated. Academic definitions were mostly derived from the institutional definitions; however, more empirical studies should be conducted in order to give a broader empirical basis to the development of the concept. In the current study, four distinct conceptual dimensions of RRI that appeared in the reviewed literature were brought out: inclusion, anticipation, responsiveness and reflexivity. Two emerging conceptual dimensions were also added: sustainability and care.

Keywords:  Ethics; European union research policy; Horizon 2020; Research governance; Research policy; Responsible innovation; Responsible research and innovation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27090147     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-016-9782-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  13 in total

1.  Lab work goes social, and vice versa: strategising public engagement processes : commentary on: "What happens in the lab does not stay in the lab: applying midstream modulation to enhance critical reflection in the laboratory".

Authors:  Brian Wynne
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Keep it complex.

Authors:  Andy Stirling
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  "Broader impacts" or "responsible research and innovation"? A comparison of two criteria for funding research in science and engineering.

Authors:  Michael Davis; Kelly Laas
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  The why and how of enabling the integration of social and ethical aspects in research and development.

Authors:  Steven M Flipse; Maarten C A van der Sanden; Patricia Osseweijer
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 5.  The Human Brain Project: social and ethical challenges.

Authors:  Nikolas Rose
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Frames and comparators: How might a debate on synthetic biology evolve?

Authors:  Helge Torgersen; Markus Schmidt
Journal:  Futures       Date:  2013-04

7.  Constructing productive engagement: pre-engagement tools for emerging technologies.

Authors:  Haico te Kulve; Arie Rip
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  What happens in the lab does not stay in the lab [corrected]: Applying midstream modulation to enhance critical reflection in the laboratory.

Authors:  Daan Schuurbiers
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 3.525

9.  Adapt or perish? Assessing the recent shift in the European research funding arena from 'ELSA' to 'RRI'.

Authors:  Hub Zwart; Laurens Landeweerd; Arjan van Rooij
Journal:  Life Sci Soc Policy       Date:  2014-05-14

10.  Just a Cog in the Machine? The Individual Responsibility of Researchers in Nanotechnology is a Duty to Collectivize.

Authors:  Shannon L Spruit; Gordon D Hoople; David A Rolfe
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.525

View more
  20 in total

1.  Teaching Responsible Research and Innovation: A Phronetic Perspective.

Authors:  Niels Mejlgaard; Malene Vinther Christensen; Roger Strand; Ivan Buljan; Mar Carrió; Marta Cayetano I Giralt; Erich Griessler; Alexander Lang; Ana Marušić; Gema Revuelta; Gemma Rodríguez; Núria Saladié; Milena Wuketich
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Methods for Practising Ethics in Research and Innovation: A Literature Review, Critical Analysis and Recommendations.

Authors:  Wessel Reijers; David Wright; Philip Brey; Karsten Weber; Rowena Rodrigues; Declan O'Sullivan; Bert Gordijn
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 3.  Practices of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Review.

Authors:  Mirjam Schuijff; Anne M Dijkstra
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Implementing ethical aspects in the development of a robotic system for nursing care: a qualitative approach.

Authors:  Svenja Nielsen; Sina Langensiepen; Murielle Madi; Maurice Elissen; Astrid Stephan; Gabriele Meyer
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2022-07-08

5.  Experiments in interdisciplinarity: Responsible research and innovation and the public good.

Authors:  Ana Delgado; Heidrun Åm
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 8.029

6.  Ethical Artificial Intelligence in Chemical Research and Development: A Dual Advantage for Sustainability.

Authors:  Erik Hermann; Gunter Hermann; Jean-Christophe Tremblay
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  The Mediating Role of Responsible Innovation in the Relationship between Stakeholder Pressure and Corporate Sustainability Performance in Times of Crisis: Evidence from Selected Regions in China.

Authors:  Hong Tian; Jiahui Tian
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 4.614

8.  Towards a phronetic space for responsible research (and innovation).

Authors:  Emanuele Bardone; Marianne Lind
Journal:  Life Sci Soc Policy       Date:  2016-05-20

9.  Open Availability of Patient Medical Photographs in Google Images Search Results: Cross-Sectional Study of Transgender Research.

Authors:  Zack Marshall; Fern Brunger; Vivian Welch; Shabnam Asghari; Chris Kaposy
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Discussion structures as tools for public deliberation.

Authors:  Eugen Octav Popa; Vincent Blok; Renate Wesselink
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2019-10-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.