Literature DB >> 19936967

Parallel, embedded or just part of the team: ethicists cooperating within a European security research project.

A van Gorp1, S van der Molen.   

Abstract

Different methods have been developed to address ethical issues during research. Most of these methods were developed at universities. In this article ethical parallel research within a Research and Technology Organization is described. Within a European project about perceived security, CPSI, the ethical issues were identified by ethicists cooperating in the project. The project CPSI was aimed at developing a research method that can be used by (local) government to monitor or assess perceived and actual security. Together with the researchers a way was sought to address the ethical issues. Several issues could be addressed by choices with regard to the design of the validation study, in this case a survey. The ethical and legal reasons that were relevant for choices in the design of the validation study were made an integral part of these decisions. Some issues were already identified during the writing of the proposal others were only identified during the research. Participating in the research gave the ethicists access to all relevant information. It made it possible to address the ethical issues when they became relevant. Ethical reasons were part of some of the discussions on research method. It proved possible to address most ethical issues satisfactorily during the research project.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19936967     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-009-9187-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  3 in total

1.  A network approach for distinguishing ethical issues in research and development.

Authors:  Sjoerd D Zwart; Ibo van de Poel; Harald van Mil; Michiel Brumsen
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Ethics consultation and autonomy.

Authors:  Jukka Varelius
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Imagining the future of photoacoustic mammography.

Authors:  Simone van der Burg
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 3.525

  3 in total
  5 in total

1.  Ethicist as designer: a pragmatic approach to ethics in the lab.

Authors:  Aimee van Wynsberghe; Scott Robbins
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Methods for Practising Ethics in Research and Innovation: A Literature Review, Critical Analysis and Recommendations.

Authors:  Wessel Reijers; David Wright; Philip Brey; Karsten Weber; Rowena Rodrigues; Declan O'Sullivan; Bert Gordijn
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Science, technology, security: Towards critical collaboration.

Authors:  Sam Weiss Evans; Matthias Leese; Dagmar Rychnovská
Journal:  Soc Stud Sci       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 3.885

4.  Ethics parallel research: an approach for (early) ethical guidance of biomedical innovation.

Authors:  Karin R Jongsma; Annelien L Bredenoord
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  Real-time ethics engagement in biomedical research: Ethics from bench to bedside.

Authors:  Jeremy Sugarman; Annelien L Bredenoord
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 8.807

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.