Literature DB >> 24254219

Ethicist as designer: a pragmatic approach to ethics in the lab.

Aimee van Wynsberghe1, Scott Robbins.   

Abstract

Contemporary literature investigating the significant impact of technology on our lives leads many to conclude that ethics must be a part of the discussion at an earlier stage in the design process i.e., before a commercial product is developed and introduced. The problem, however, is the question regarding how ethics can be incorporated into an earlier stage of technological development and it is this question that we argue has not yet been answered adequately. There is no consensus amongst scholars as to the kind of ethics that should be practiced, nor the individual selected to perform this ethical analysis. One school of thought holds that ethics should have pragmatic value in research and design and that it should be implemented by the (computer) engineers and/or (computer) scientists themselves, while another school of thought holds that ethics need not be so pragmatic. For the latter, the ethical reflection can aim at a variety of goals, and be carried out by an ethicist. None of the approaches resulting from these lines of thinking have been adopted on a wide-scale basis. To that end, the approach presented here is intended to bridge the gap between these schools of thought. It is our contention that ethics ought to be pragmatic and to provide utility for the design process and we maintain that adequate ethical reflection, and all that it entails, ought to be conducted by an ethicist. Thus, we propose a novel role for the ethicist--the ethicist as designer--who subscribes to a pragmatic view of ethics in order to bring ethics into the research and design of artifacts-no matter the stage of development. In this paper we outline the series of steps that a pragmatic value analysis entails: uncovering relevant values, scrutinizing these values and, working towards the translation of values into technical content. In conclusion, we present a list of tasks for the ethicist in his/her role as designer on the interdisciplinary team.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24254219     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-013-9498-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  7 in total

1.  The application of ethics to engineering and the engineer's moral responsibility: perspectives for a research agenda.

Authors:  A Grunwald
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Understanding moral responsibility in the design of trailers.

Authors:  Simone van der Burg; Anke van Gorp
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Imagining the future of photoacoustic mammography.

Authors:  Simone van der Burg
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Parallel, embedded or just part of the team: ethicists cooperating within a European security research project.

Authors:  A van Gorp; S van der Molen
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Ethics as a beneficial Trojan horse in a technological society.

Authors:  Ramón Queraltó
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-06-26       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Designing robots for care: care centered value-sensitive design.

Authors:  Aimee van Wynsberghe
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  What values in design? The challenge of incorporating moral values into design.

Authors:  Noëmi Manders-Huits
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 3.525

  7 in total
  8 in total

1.  Imaginative Value Sensitive Design: Using Moral Imagination Theory to Inform Responsible Technology Design.

Authors:  Steven Umbrello
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Bringing the National Security Agency into the Classroom: Ethical Reflections on Academia-Intelligence Agency Partnerships.

Authors:  Christopher Kampe; Gwendolynne Reid; Paul Jones; Colleen S; Sean S; Kathleen M Vogel
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Methods for Practising Ethics in Research and Innovation: A Literature Review, Critical Analysis and Recommendations.

Authors:  Wessel Reijers; David Wright; Philip Brey; Karsten Weber; Rowena Rodrigues; Declan O'Sullivan; Bert Gordijn
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Critiquing the Reasons for Making Artificial Moral Agents.

Authors:  Aimee van Wynsberghe; Scott Robbins
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Refining Value Sensitive Design: A (Capability-Based) Procedural Ethics Approach to Technological Design for Well-Being.

Authors:  Alessandra Cenci; Dylan Cawthorne
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Touching at a Distance: Digital Intimacies, Haptic Platforms, and the Ethics of Consent.

Authors:  Madelaine Ley; Nathan Rambukkana
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  Ethics and Values in Design: A Structured Review and Theoretical Critique.

Authors:  Joseph Donia; James A Shaw
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  Justificatory explanations in machine learning: for increased transparency through documenting how key concepts drive and underpin design and engineering decisions.

Authors:  David Casacuberta; Ariel Guersenzvaig; Cristian Moyano-Fernández
Journal:  AI Soc       Date:  2022-03-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.