Literature DB >> 23096776

Midstream modulation in biotechnology industry: redefining what is 'part of the job' of researchers in industry.

Steven M Flipse1, Maarten C A van der Sanden, Patricia Osseweijer.   

Abstract

In response to an increasing amount of policy papers stressing the need for integrating social and ethical aspects in Research and Development (R&D) practices, science studies scholars have conducted integrative research and experiments with science and innovation actors. One widely employed integration method is Midstream Modulation (MM), in which an 'embedded humanist' interacts in regular meetings with researchers to engage them with the social and ethical aspects of their work. While the possibility of using MM to enhance critical reflection has been demonstrated in academic settings, few attempts have been made to examine its appropriateness in industry. This paper describes the outcomes of a case study aiming to find out firstly whether MM can effectively be deployed to encourage and facilitate researchers to actively include social and ethical aspects in their daily R&D practice, and secondly to what extent the integration activities could form an integral part of the engaged industrial researchers' professional activities. Our data show that after MM, researchers display increased reflexive awareness on the social and ethical aspects of their work and acknowledge the relevance and utility of such aspects on their daily practice. Also, all participants considered actively reflecting on social and ethical aspects to be part of their work. Future research on the role of MM in industrial settings could focus on how to embed social and ethical integration as a regular part of innovation practice. We suggest that one possibility would be through aligning social and ethical aspects with innovation Key Performance Indicators.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23096776     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-012-9411-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  13 in total

1.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.

Authors:  R M Ryan; E L Deci
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2000-01

2.  Editorial overview: public science and technology scholars: engaging whom?

Authors:  Erik Fisher
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Lab work goes social, and vice versa: strategising public engagement processes : commentary on: "What happens in the lab does not stay in the lab: applying midstream modulation to enhance critical reflection in the laboratory".

Authors:  Brian Wynne
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Engagement agents in the making: on the front lines of socio-technical integration : commentary on: "Constructing productive engagement: pre-engagement tools for emerging technologies".

Authors:  Shannon N Conley
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 5.  Is cell science dangerous?

Authors:  Lewis Wolpert
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Lab-scale intervention. Science & Society Series on Convergence Research.

Authors:  Daan Schuurbiers; Erik Fisher
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 8.807

7.  The rock 'n' roll of knowledge co-production. Science & Society Series on Convergence Research.

Authors:  Peter Stegmaier
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 8.807

8.  Constitutional moments in governing science and technology.

Authors:  Sheila Jasanoff
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 3.525

9.  Assessing Expectations: Towards a Toolbox for an Ethics of Emerging Technologies.

Authors:  Federica Lucivero; Tsjalling Swierstra; Marianne Boenink
Journal:  Nanoethics       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 0.917

10.  What happens in the lab does not stay in the lab [corrected]: Applying midstream modulation to enhance critical reflection in the laboratory.

Authors:  Daan Schuurbiers
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 3.525

View more
  10 in total

1.  The why and how of enabling the integration of social and ethical aspects in research and development.

Authors:  Steven M Flipse; Maarten C A van der Sanden; Patricia Osseweijer
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Setting up spaces for collaboration in industry between researchers from the natural and social sciences.

Authors:  Steven M Flipse; Maarten C A van der Sanden; Patricia Osseweijer
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  The wicked problem of socially responsible innovation.

Authors:  Steven M Flipse; Johannes H De Winde; Patricia Osseweijer; Maarten C A van der Sanden
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  A Mobilising Concept? Unpacking Academic Representations of Responsible Research and Innovation.

Authors:  Barbara E Ribeiro; Robert D J Smith; Kate Millar
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 5.  Practices of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Review.

Authors:  Mirjam Schuijff; Anne M Dijkstra
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 6.  The Culture of Biosafety, Biosecurity, and Responsible Conduct in the Life Sciences: A Comprehensive Literature Review.

Authors:  Dana Perkins; Kathleen Danskin; A Elise Rowe; Alicia A Livinski
Journal:  Appl Biosaf       Date:  2019-03-01

7.  Translational Neuroethics: A Vision for a More Integrated, Inclusive, and Impactful Field.

Authors:  Anna Wexler; Laura Specker Sullivan
Journal:  AJOB Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-01

8.  Specificity and Engagement: Increasing ELSI's Relevance to Nano-Scientists.

Authors:  Barry L Shumpert; Amy K Wolfe; David J Bjornstad; Stephanie Wang; Maria Fernanda Campa
Journal:  Nanoethics       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 0.917

9.  Creative tensions: mutual responsiveness adapted to private sector research and development.

Authors:  Matti Sonck; Lotte Asveld; Laurens Landeweerd; Patricia Osseweijer
Journal:  Life Sci Soc Policy       Date:  2017-09-07

10.  Integrating Value Considerations in the Decision Making for the Design of Biorefineries.

Authors:  Mar Palmeros Parada; Lotte Asveld; Patricia Osseweijer; John Alexander Posada
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 3.525

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.