Literature DB >> 23224703

The why and how of enabling the integration of social and ethical aspects in research and development.

Steven M Flipse1, Maarten C A van der Sanden, Patricia Osseweijer.   

Abstract

New and Emerging Science and Technology (NEST) based innovations, e.g. in the field of Life Sciences or Nanotechnology, frequently raise societal and political concerns. To address these concerns NEST researchers are expected to deploy socially responsible R&D practices. This requires researchers to integrate social and ethical aspects (SEAs) in their daily work. Many methods can facilitate such integration. Still, why and how researchers should and could use SEAs remains largely unclear. In this paper we aim to relate motivations for NEST researchers to include SEAs in their work, and the requirements to establish such integration from their perspectives, to existing approaches that can be used to establish integration of SEAs in the daily work of these NEST researchers. Based on our analyses, we argue that for the successful integration of SEAs in R&D practice, collaborative approaches between researchers and scholars from the social sciences and humanities seem the most successful. The only way to explore whether that is in fact the case, is by embarking on collaborative research endeavours.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23224703     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-012-9423-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  29 in total

1.  Responsible innovation: a pilot study with the U.K. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council.

Authors:  Richard Owen; Nicola Goldberg
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  Should we make a fuss? A case for social responsibility in science.

Authors:  Jon Beckwith; Franklin Huang
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  The role of social scientists in synthetic biology. Science & Society Series on Convergence Research.

Authors:  Jane Calvert; Paul Martin
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  Lab-scale intervention. Science & Society Series on Convergence Research.

Authors:  Daan Schuurbiers; Erik Fisher
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 8.807

5.  The rock 'n' roll of knowledge co-production. Science & Society Series on Convergence Research.

Authors:  Peter Stegmaier
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 8.807

6.  Commentary: Looking for conflict and finding none?

Authors:  Matthias Kaiser
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2012-02

7.  Mind the gap.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Futures of ELSA. Science & Society Series on Convergence Research.

Authors:  Arie Rip
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 9.  Framing the elusive concept of sustainability: a sustainability hierarchy.

Authors:  Julian D Marshall; Michael W Toffel
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  What happens in the lab does not stay in the lab [corrected]: Applying midstream modulation to enhance critical reflection in the laboratory.

Authors:  Daan Schuurbiers
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 3.525

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Definitions and Conceptual Dimensions of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Mirjam Burget; Emanuele Bardone; Margus Pedaste
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  A Mobilising Concept? Unpacking Academic Representations of Responsible Research and Innovation.

Authors:  Barbara E Ribeiro; Robert D J Smith; Kate Millar
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Methods for Practising Ethics in Research and Innovation: A Literature Review, Critical Analysis and Recommendations.

Authors:  Wessel Reijers; David Wright; Philip Brey; Karsten Weber; Rowena Rodrigues; Declan O'Sullivan; Bert Gordijn
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 4.  Practices of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Review.

Authors:  Mirjam Schuijff; Anne M Dijkstra
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Responsible Reporting: Neuroimaging News in the Age of Responsible Research and Innovation.

Authors:  Irja Marije de Jong; Frank Kupper; Marlous Arentshorst; Jacqueline Broerse
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Organizing a Collaborative Development of Technological Design Requirements Using a Constructive Dialogue on Value Profiles: A Case in Automated Vehicle Development.

Authors:  Steven M Flipse; Steven Puylaert
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  Creative tensions: mutual responsiveness adapted to private sector research and development.

Authors:  Matti Sonck; Lotte Asveld; Laurens Landeweerd; Patricia Osseweijer
Journal:  Life Sci Soc Policy       Date:  2017-09-07

8.  Ethical Artificial Intelligence in Chemical Research and Development: A Dual Advantage for Sustainability.

Authors:  Erik Hermann; Gunter Hermann; Jean-Christophe Tremblay
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 3.525

9.  Nanocommunication design in graduate-level education and research training programs at Osaka University.

Authors:  Mizuki Sekiya; SoonHwa An; Masafumi Ata
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 2.253

10.  Towards a phronetic space for responsible research (and innovation).

Authors:  Emanuele Bardone; Marianne Lind
Journal:  Life Sci Soc Policy       Date:  2016-05-20
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.