Literature DB >> 23467918

Setting up spaces for collaboration in industry between researchers from the natural and social sciences.

Steven M Flipse1, Maarten C A van der Sanden, Patricia Osseweijer.   

Abstract

Policy makers call upon researchers from the natural and social sciences to collaborate for the responsible development and deployment of innovations. Collaborations are projected to enhance both the technical quality of innovations, and the extent to which relevant social and ethical considerations are integrated into their development. This could make these innovations more socially robust and responsible, particularly in new and emerging scientific and technological fields, such as synthetic biology and nanotechnology. Some researchers from both fields have embarked on collaborative research activities, using various Technology Assessment approaches and Socio-Technical Integration Research activities such as Midstream Modulation. Still, practical experience of collaborations in industry is limited, while much may be expected from industry in terms of socially responsible innovation development. Experience in and guidelines on how to set up and manage such collaborations are not easily available. Having carried out various collaborative research activities in industry ourselves, we aim to share in this paper our experiences in setting up and working in such collaborations. We highlight the possibilities and boundaries in setting up and managing collaborations, and discuss how we have experienced the emergence of 'collaborative spaces.' Hopefully our findings can facilitate and encourage others to set up collaborative research endeavours.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23467918     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-013-9434-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  14 in total

1.  Responsible innovation: a pilot study with the U.K. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council.

Authors:  Richard Owen; Nicola Goldberg
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  Towards the conscientious development of ethical nanotechnology.

Authors:  Rosalyn W Berne
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Sensitization: reciprocity and reflection in scientific practice. Science & Society Series on Convergence Research.

Authors:  Bart Penders; Rein Vos; Klasien Horstman
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  The role of social scientists in synthetic biology. Science & Society Series on Convergence Research.

Authors:  Jane Calvert; Paul Martin
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 8.807

5.  The rock 'n' roll of knowledge co-production. Science & Society Series on Convergence Research.

Authors:  Peter Stegmaier
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 8.807

6.  Media attention to GM food cases: An innovation perspective.

Authors:  Steven M Flipse; Patricia Osseweijer
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2012-10-16

7.  Mind the gap.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Research thrives on integration of natural and social sciences.

Authors:  Erik Fisher; Simon Biggs; Stuart Lindsay; Jie Zhao
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Midstream modulation in biotechnology industry: redefining what is 'part of the job' of researchers in industry.

Authors:  Steven M Flipse; Maarten C A van der Sanden; Patricia Osseweijer
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 3.525

10.  What happens in the lab does not stay in the lab [corrected]: Applying midstream modulation to enhance critical reflection in the laboratory.

Authors:  Daan Schuurbiers
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 3.525

View more
  6 in total

1.  The DNA of socially responsible innovation: Social and natural scientists need to establish mutual understanding and a common language to efficiently work together.

Authors:  Steven M Flipse; Maarten C A van der Sanden; Maud Radstake; Johannes H De Winde; Patricia Osseweijer
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  The wicked problem of socially responsible innovation.

Authors:  Steven M Flipse; Johannes H De Winde; Patricia Osseweijer; Maarten C A van der Sanden
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  A Mobilising Concept? Unpacking Academic Representations of Responsible Research and Innovation.

Authors:  Barbara E Ribeiro; Robert D J Smith; Kate Millar
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 4.  Practices of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Review.

Authors:  Mirjam Schuijff; Anne M Dijkstra
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Translational Neuroethics: A Vision for a More Integrated, Inclusive, and Impactful Field.

Authors:  Anna Wexler; Laura Specker Sullivan
Journal:  AJOB Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-01

6.  Aligning sustainability assessment with responsible research and innovation: Towards a framework for Constructive Sustainability Assessment.

Authors:  Nicholas E Matthews; Laurence Stamford; Philip Shapira
Journal:  Sustain Prod Consum       Date:  2019-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.