Literature DB >> 18596646

Interaural time discrimination of envelopes carried on high-frequency tones as a function of level and interaural carrier mismatch.

Deidra A Blanks1, Emily Buss, John H Grose, Douglas C Fitzpatrick, Joseph W Hall.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The present study investigated interaural time discrimination for binaurally mismatched carrier frequencies in listeners with normal hearing. One goal of the investigation was to gain insights into binaural hearing in patients with bilateral cochlear implants, where the coding of interaural time differences (ITDs) may be limited by mismatches in the neural populations receiving stimulation on each side.
DESIGN: Temporal envelopes were manipulated to present low frequency timing cues to high-frequency auditory channels. Carrier frequencies near 4 kHz were amplitude modulated at 128 Hz via multiplication with a half-wave rectified sinusoid, and that modulation was either in-phase across ears or delayed to one ear. Detection thresholds for nonzero ITDs were measured for a range of stimulus levels and a range of carrier frequency mismatches. Data were also collected under conditions designed to limit cues based on stimulus spectral spread, including masking and truncation of sidebands associated with modulation.
RESULTS: Listeners with normal hearing can detect ITDs in the face of substantial mismatches in carrier frequency across ears.
CONCLUSIONS: The processing of ITDs in listeners with normal hearing is likely based on spread of excitation into binaurally matched auditory channels. Sensitivity to ITDs in listeners with cochlear implants may depend on spread of current that results in the stimulation of neural populations that share common tonotopic space bilaterally.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18596646      PMCID: PMC2648125          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181775e03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  45 in total

1.  Dependence of binaural masking level differences on center frequency, masker bandwidth, and interaural parameters.

Authors:  S van de Par; A Kohlrausch
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The apparent immunity of high-frequency "transposed" stimuli to low-frequency binaural interference.

Authors:  Leslie R Bernstein; Constantine Trahiotis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Measures of extents of laterality for high-frequency "transposed" stimuli under conditions of binaural interference.

Authors:  Leslie R Bernstein; Constantine Trahiotis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Cochlear implants: the view from the brain.

Authors:  John C Middlebrooks; Julie Arenberg Bierer; Russell L Snyder
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Lateralization of large interaural delays.

Authors:  J E Mossop; J F Culling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Psychophysical studies with two binaural cochlear implant subjects.

Authors:  R J van Hoesel; G M Clark
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Sensitivity to interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors.

Authors:  Bernhard Laback; Stefan-Marcel Pok; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner; Werner A Deutsch; Karin Schmid
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Conductive hearing loss produces a reversible binaural hearing impairment.

Authors:  D R Moore; J E Hine; Z D Jiang; H Matsuda; C H Parsons; A J King
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Learning to discriminate interaural time differences: an exploratory study with amplitude-modulated stimuli.

Authors:  Daniel Rowan; Mark E Lutman
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.117

10.  Binaural unmasking with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Christopher J Long; Robert P Carlyon; Ruth Y Litovsky; Daniel H Downs
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-08-29
View more
  13 in total

1.  Current and planned cochlear implant research at New York University Laboratory for Translational Auditory Research.

Authors:  Mario A Svirsky; Matthew B Fitzgerald; Arlene Neuman; Elad Sagi; Chin-Tuan Tan; Darlene Ketten; Brett Martin
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on binaural fusion and lateralization in bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Alan Kan; Corey Stoelb; Ruth Y Litovsky; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of interaural pitch matching and auditory image centering on binaural sensitivity in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on the salience of binaural cues in conditions that simulate bilateral cochlear-implant listening.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Corey Stoelb; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Binaural Pitch Fusion in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Lina A J Reiss; Jennifer R Fowler; Curtis L Hartling; Yonghee Oh
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Self-Selection of Frequency Tables with Bilateral Mismatches in an Acoustic Simulation of a Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  Matthew B Fitzgerald; Ksenia Prosolovich; Chin-Tuan Tan; E Katelyn Glassman; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Sensitivity to binaural temporal-envelope beats with single-sided deafness and a cochlear implant as a measure of tonotopic match (L).

Authors:  Coral E Dirks; Peggy B Nelson; Matthew B Winn; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Effect of channel separation and interaural mismatch on fusion and lateralization in normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Alan Kan; Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Binaural pitch fusion: Comparison of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Lina A J Reiss; Corey S Shayman; Emily P Walker; Keri O Bennett; Jennifer R Fowler; Curtis L Hartling; Bess Glickman; Michael R Lasarev; Yonghee Oh
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The Effect of Simulated Interaural Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Corey A Stoelb; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.