Literature DB >> 10530018

Dependence of binaural masking level differences on center frequency, masker bandwidth, and interaural parameters.

S van de Par1, A Kohlrausch.   

Abstract

Thresholds for sinusoidal signals masked by noise of various bandwidths were obtained for three binaural configurations: N0S0 (both masker and signal interaurally in phase), N0S pi (masker interaurally in phase and signal interaurally phase-reversed), and N pi S0 (masker interaurally phase-reversed and signal interaurally in phase). Signal frequencies of 125, 250, 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz were combined with masker bandwidths of 5, 10, 25, 50, 100, 250, 500, 1000, 2000, 4000, and 8000 Hz, with the restriction that masker bandwidths never exceeded twice the signal frequency. The overall noise power was kept constant at 70 dB SPL for all bandwidths. Results, expressed as signal-to-total-noise power ratios, show that N0S0 thresholds generally decrease with increasing bandwidth, even for subcritical bandwidths. Only at frequencies of 2 and 4 kHz do thresholds appear to remain constant for bandwidths around the critical bandwidth. N0S pi thresholds are generally less dependent on bandwidth up to two or three times the (monaural) critical bandwidth. Beyond this bandwidth, thresholds decrease with a similar slope as for the N0S0 condition. N pi S0 conditions show about the same bandwidth dependence as N0S pi, but thresholds in the former condition are generally higher. This threshold difference is largest at low frequencies and disappears above 2 kHz. An explanation for wider operational binaural critical bandwidth is given which assumes that binaural disparities are combined across frequency in an optimally weighted way.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10530018     DOI: 10.1121/1.427942

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  19 in total

Review 1.  Development of the auditory system.

Authors:  Ruth Litovsky
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2015

2.  Binaural comodulation masking release: effects of masker interaural correlation.

Authors:  Joseph W Hall; Emily Buss; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Superposition of masking releases.

Authors:  Bastian Epp; Jesko L Verhey
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 1.621

4.  Across-frequency envelope correlation discrimination and masked signal detection.

Authors:  John H Grose; Emily Buss; Heather L Porter; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The effect of interaural fluctuation rate on correlation change discrimination.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-11-21

6.  Sensorineural Hearing Loss Diminishes Use of Temporal Envelope Cues: Evidence From Roving-Level Tone-in-Noise Detection.

Authors:  U-Cheng Leong; Douglas M Schwarz; Kenneth S Henry; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Binaural unmasking with multiple adjacent masking electrodes in bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Thomas Lu; Ruth Litovsky; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Exploring the additivity of binaural and monaural masking release.

Authors:  Joseph W Hall; Emily Buss; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Sensitivity to interaural envelope correlation changes in bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Age-related differences in binaural masking level differences: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Robert Ellis; Julie Mehta; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.