Literature DB >> 9745740

Lateralization of large interaural delays.

J E Mossop1, J F Culling.   

Abstract

Two experiments explored the limits of listeners' abilities to interpret large interaural time delays (ITDs) in terms of laterality. In experiment 1, just-noticeable differences (jnd's) were measured, using an adaptive procedure, for various reference ITDs of Gaussian noise between 0 and 3000 microseconds. The jnd's increased gradually with reference ITD for reference ITDs between 0 microsecond and 700 microseconds, then rose sharply to plateau at much higher jnd's for the remainder of the standard ITDs tested (1000-3000 microseconds). The second experiment tested left/right discrimination of Gaussian noise that was interaurally delayed up to 10,000 microseconds, and high-pass filtered to cutoff frequencies between 0 Hz (broadband) and 3000 Hz. There was good discrimination (62%; significantly above chance, p < 0.05) for broadband and 500-Hz high-pass cutoff stimuli for all ITDs up to 10,000 microseconds, and for ITDs up to at least 3000 microseconds for higher high-pass cutoff frequencies. These results indicate that laterality cues are discriminable at much larger ITDs than are experienced in free-field listening, even in the absence of energy below 3 kHz.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9745740     DOI: 10.1121/1.424369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  20 in total

1.  Neural sensitivity to interaural time differences: beyond the Jeffress model.

Authors:  D C Fitzpatrick; S Kuwada; R Batra
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  A physiologically based model of interaural time difference discrimination.

Authors:  Kenneth E Hancock; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-08-11       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Context effects in the discriminability of spatial cues.

Authors:  Julia Kerstin Maier; David McAlpine; Georg M Klump; Daniel Pressnitzer
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-12-22

4.  Generating partially correlated noise--a comparison of methods.

Authors:  William M Hartmann; Yun Jin Cho
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The neural representation of interaural time differences in gerbils is transformed from midbrain to cortex.

Authors:  Lucile A C Belliveau; Dmitry R Lyamzin; Nicholas A Lesica
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The effect of envelope modulations on binaural processing.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Stephen Fong; Olga Stakhovskaya
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  The fMRI Data of Thompson et al. (2006) Do Not Constrain How the Human Midbrain Represents Interaural Time Delay.

Authors:  Richard M Stern; H Steven Colburn; Leslie R Bernstein; Constantine Trahiotis
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-05-14

8.  Neural coding of interaural time differences with bilateral cochlear implants: effects of congenital deafness.

Authors:  Kenneth E Hancock; Victor Noel; David K Ryugo; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Behavioral sensitivity to interaural time differences in the rabbit.

Authors:  Charles S Ebert; Deidra A Blanks; Mihir R Patel; Charles S Coffey; Allen F Marshall; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Interaural time discrimination of envelopes carried on high-frequency tones as a function of level and interaural carrier mismatch.

Authors:  Deidra A Blanks; Emily Buss; John H Grose; Douglas C Fitzpatrick; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.