Literature DB >> 28372056

Binaural pitch fusion: Comparison of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Lina A J Reiss1, Corey S Shayman1, Emily P Walker1, Keri O Bennett1, Jennifer R Fowler1, Curtis L Hartling1, Bess Glickman1, Michael R Lasarev2, Yonghee Oh1.   

Abstract

Binaural pitch fusion is the fusion of dichotically presented tones that evoke different pitches between the ears. In normal-hearing (NH) listeners, the frequency range over which binaural pitch fusion occurs is usually <0.2 octaves. Recently, broad fusion ranges of 1-4 octaves were demonstrated in bimodal cochlear implant users. In the current study, it was hypothesized that hearing aid (HA) users would also exhibit broad fusion. Fusion ranges were measured in both NH and hearing-impaired (HI) listeners with hearing losses ranging from mild-moderate to severe-profound, and relationships of fusion range with demographic factors and with diplacusis were examined. Fusion ranges of NH and HI listeners averaged 0.17 ± 0.13 octaves and 1.7 ± 1.5 octaves, respectively. In HI listeners, fusion ranges were positively correlated with a principal component measure of the covarying factors of young age, early age of hearing loss onset, and long durations of hearing loss and HA use, but not with hearing threshold, amplification level, or diplacusis. In NH listeners, no correlations were observed with age, hearing threshold, or diplacusis. The association of broad fusion with early onset, long duration of hearing loss suggests a possible role of long-term experience with hearing loss and amplification in the development of broad fusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28372056      PMCID: PMC5848869          DOI: 10.1121/1.4978009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  31 in total

1.  DIPLACUSIS IN UNILATERAL HIGH-FREQUENCY HEARING LOSSES.

Authors:  J H GAETH; T W NORRIS
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1965-03

2.  Prediction of speech recognition from audibility in older listeners with hearing loss: effects of age, amplification, and background noise.

Authors:  Pamela E Souza; Kumiko T Boike; Kerry Witherell; Kelly Tremblay
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on binaural fusion and lateralization in bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Alan Kan; Corey Stoelb; Ruth Y Litovsky; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Dichotic pitch fusion.

Authors:  G van den Brink; K Sintnicolaas; W S van Stam
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Stereopsis and amblyopia: A mini-review.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi; David C Knill; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Pure-tone pitch anomalies. II. Pitch-intensity effects and diplacusis in impaired ears.

Authors:  E M Burns; C Turner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Aberrant tonotopic organization in the inner ear damaged by kanamycin.

Authors:  D Robertson; B M Johnstone
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Tuning curves and pitch matches in a listener with a unilateral, low-frequency hearing loss.

Authors:  M Florentine; A J Houtsma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Pure-tone anomalies. I. Pitch-intensity effects and diplacusis in normal ears.

Authors:  E M Burns
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Binaural Diplacusis and Its Relationship with Hearing-Threshold Asymmetry.

Authors:  David Colin; Christophe Micheyl; Anneline Girod; Eric Truy; Stéphane Gallégo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  11 in total

1.  Interaural Time Difference Perception with a Cochlear Implant and a Normal Ear.

Authors:  Tom Francart; Konstantin Wiebe; Thomas Wesarg
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-09-27

2.  Asymmetric temporal envelope encoding: Implications for within- and across-ear envelope comparison.

Authors:  Sean R Anderson; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Binaural Pitch Fusion in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Lina A J Reiss; Jennifer R Fowler; Curtis L Hartling; Yonghee Oh
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Binaural pitch fusion: Pitch averaging and dominance in hearing-impaired listeners with broad fusion.

Authors:  Yonghee Oh; Lina A J Reiss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Level differences impact the fusion of concurrent vowels dissimilarly within versus across ears.

Authors:  Langchen Fan; Lina A J Reiss; Michelle R Molis
Journal:  JASA Express Lett       Date:  2022-09-07

6.  Binaural Pitch Fusion in Children With Normal Hearing, Hearing Aids, and Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Curtis L Hartling; Jennifer R Fowler; Gemaine N Stark; Bess Glickman; Morgan Eddolls; Yonghee Oh; Katrina Ramsey; Lina A J Reiss
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.562

7.  Binaural Pitch Fusion: Binaural Pitch Averaging in Cochlear Implant Users With Broad Binaural Fusion.

Authors:  Yonghee Oh; Lina A J Reiss
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.562

8.  Hearing Loss, Tinnitus, Hyperacusis, and Diplacusis in Professional Musicians: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Arianna Di Stadio; Laura Dipietro; Giampietro Ricci; Antonio Della Volpe; Antonio Minni; Antonio Greco; Marco de Vincentiis; Massimo Ralli
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Binaural pitch fusion: Effects of sound level in listeners with normal hearing.

Authors:  Sean R Anderson; Bess Glickman; Yonghee Oh; Lina A J Reiss
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Binaural Pitch Fusion: Effects of Amplitude Modulation.

Authors:  Yonghee Oh; Lina A J Reiss
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.