Literature DB >> 26040213

Loudness Context Effects in Normal-Hearing Listeners and Cochlear-Implant Users.

Ningyuan Wang1, Heather A Kreft, Andrew J Oxenham.   

Abstract

Context effects in loudness have been observed in normal auditory perception and may reflect a general gain control of the auditory system. However, little is known about such effects in cochlear-implant (CI) users. Discovering whether and how CI users experience loudness context effects should help us better understand the underlying mechanisms. In the present study, we examined the effects of a long-duration (1-s) intense precursor on the loudness relations between shorter-duration (200-ms) target and comparison stimuli. The precursor and target were separated by a silent gap of 50 ms, and the target and comparison were separated by a silent gap of 2 s. For normal-hearing listeners, the stimuli were narrowband noises; for CI users, all stimuli were delivered as pulse trains directly to the implant. Significant changes in loudness were observed in normal-hearing listeners, in line with earlier studies. The CI users also experienced some loudness changes but, in contrast to the results from normal-hearing listeners, the effect did not increase with increasing level difference between precursor and target. A "dual-process" hypothesis, used to explain earlier data from normal-hearing listeners, may provide an account of the present data by assuming that one of the two mechanisms, involving "induced loudness reduction," was absent or reduced in CI users.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26040213      PMCID: PMC4488167          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-015-0523-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  29 in total

1.  Loudness enhancement: monaural, binaural, and dichotic.

Authors:  R Elmasian; R Galambos
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  What is the role of the medial olivocochlear system in speech-in-noise processing?

Authors:  Jessica de Boer; A Roger D Thornton; Katrin Krumbholz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-08-01       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Vowel enhancement effects in cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Ningyuan Wang; Heather Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The MOC reflex during active listening to speech.

Authors:  Angela C Garinis; Theodore Glattke; Barbara K Cone
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  A frequency-selective feedback model of auditory efferent suppression and its implications for the recognition of speech in noise.

Authors:  Nicholas R Clark; Guy J Brown; Tim Jürgens; Ray Meddis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Loudness enhancement following contralateral stimulation.

Authors:  R Galambos; J Bauer; T Picton; K Squires; N Squires
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Loudness enhancement and decrement in four paradigms.

Authors:  R Elmasian; R Galambos; A Bernheim
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Speech perception in tones and noise via cochlear implants reveals influence of spectral resolution on temporal processing.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Heather A Kreft
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Top-down influences of the medial olivocochlear efferent system in speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Srikanta K Mishra; Mark E Lutman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

1.  Effects of auditory enhancement on the loudness of masker and target components.

Authors:  Ningyuan Wang; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Auditory Enhancement in Cochlear-Implant Users Under Simultaneous and Forward Masking.

Authors:  Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-16

3.  Auditory enhancement and the role of spectral resolution in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Acoustic Context Alters Vowel Categorization in Perception of Noise-Vocoded Speech.

Authors:  Christian E Stilp
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-09

5.  Auditory enhancement under simultaneous masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Heather A Kreft; Magdalena Wojtczak; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Induced Loudness Reduction and Enhancement in Acoustic and Electric Hearing.

Authors:  Ningyuan Wang; Heather Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-31

7.  Neural Representation of Loudness: Cortical Evoked Potentials in an Induced Loudness Reduction Experiment.

Authors:  Florian H Schmidt; Manfred Mauermann; Birger Kollmeier
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.