Literature DB >> 18537385

Effects of frequency disparities on trading of an ambiguous tone between two competing auditory objects.

Adrian K C Lee1, Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham.   

Abstract

Listeners are relatively good at estimating the true content of each physical source in a sound mixture in most everyday situations. However, if there is a spectrotemporal element that logically could belong to more than one object, the correct way to group that element can be ambiguous. Many psychoacoustic experiments have implicitly assumed that when a sound mixture contains ambiguous sound elements, the ambiguous elements "trade" between competing sources, such that the elements contribute more to one object in conditions when they contribute less to others. However, few studies have directly tested whether such trading occurs. While some studies found trading, trading failed in some recent studies in which spatial cues were manipulated to alter the perceptual organization. The current study extended this work by exploring whether trading occurs for similar sound mixtures when frequency content, rather than spatial cues, was manipulated to alter grouping. Unlike when spatial cues were manipulated, results are roughly consistent with trading. Together, results suggest that the degree to which trading is obeyed depends on how stimuli are manipulated to affect object formation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18537385      PMCID: PMC9014251          DOI: 10.1121/1.2908282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  30 in total

1.  Attention increases sensitivity of V4 neurons.

Authors:  J H Reynolds; T Pasternak; R Desimone
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Attentional modulation strength in cortical area MT depends on stimulus contrast.

Authors:  Julio Martínez-Trujillo; Stefan Treue
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-07-18       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Rhythmic masking release: effects of asynchrony, temporal overlap, harmonic relations, and source separation on cross-spectral grouping.

Authors:  Martine Turgeon; Albert S Bregman; Brian Roberts
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  A sound element gets lost in perceptual competition.

Authors:  Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Adrian K C Lee; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Grouping in pitch perception: evidence for sequential constraints.

Authors:  C J Darwin; R W Hukin; B Y al-Khatib
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Auditory grouping.

Authors:  C J Darwin
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Effects of attention and unilateral neglect on auditory stream segregation.

Authors:  R P Carlyon; R Cusack; J M Foxton; I H Robertson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Auditory induction: reciprocal changes in alternating sounds.

Authors:  R M Warren; J A Bashford; E W Healy; B S Brubaker
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-03

9.  Competition among auditory streaming, dichotic fusion, and diotic fusion.

Authors:  H Steiger; A S Bregman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-08

10.  Primitive stream segregation of tone sequences without differences in fundamental frequency or passband.

Authors:  Brian Roberts; Brian R Glasberg; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  7 in total

1.  Feature assignment in perception of auditory figure.

Authors:  Melissa K Gregg; Arthur G Samuel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Measuring the perceived content of auditory objects using a matching paradigm.

Authors:  Adrian K C Lee; Steve Babcock; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-05-13

3.  Localization interference between components in an auditory scene.

Authors:  Adrian K C Lee; Ade Deane-Pratt; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Auditory stream segregation and the perception of across-frequency synchrony.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Cynthia Hunter; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 5.  Selective attention in normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Virginia Best
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-10-30

6.  EEG signatures accompanying auditory figure-ground segregation.

Authors:  Brigitta Tóth; Zsuzsanna Kocsis; Gábor P Háden; Ágnes Szerafin; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; István Winkler
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 7.  Predictability effects in auditory scene analysis: a review.

Authors:  Alexandra Bendixen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 4.677

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.