Literature DB >> 21223942

Auditory grouping.

C J Darwin.   

Abstract

Although our subjective experience of the world is one of discrete sound sources, the individual frequency components that make up these separate sources are spread across the frequency spectrum. Listeners. use various simple cues, including common onset time and harmonicity, to help them achieve this perceptual separation. Our ability to use harmonicity to segregate two simultaneous sound sources is constrained by the frequency resolution of the auditory system, and is much more effective for low-numbered, resolved harmonics than for higher-numbered, unresolved ones. Our ability to use interaural time-differences (ITDs) in perceptual segregation poses a paradox. Although ITDs are the dominant cue for the localization of complex sounds, listeners cannot use ITDs alone to segregate the speech of a single talker from similar simultaneous sounds. Listeners are, however, very good at using ITD to track a particular sound source across time. This difference might reflect two different levels of auditory processing, indicating that listeners attend to grouped auditory objects rather than to those frequencies that share a common ITD.

Year:  1997        PMID: 21223942     DOI: 10.1016/S1364-6613(97)01097-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  59 in total

1.  Spatial cues alone produce inaccurate sound segregation: the effect of interaural time differences.

Authors:  Andrew Schwartz; Josh H McDermott; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Why middle-aged listeners have trouble hearing in everyday settings.

Authors:  Dorea Ruggles; Hari Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Membrane potential dynamics of populations of cortical neurons during auditory streaming.

Authors:  Brandon J Farley; Arnaud J Noreña
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Effects of reverberant spatial cues on attention-dependent object formation.

Authors:  Adrian K C Lee; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-01-23

5.  Processing of natural sounds: characterization of multipeak spectral tuning in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Michelle Moerel; Federico De Martino; Roberta Santoro; Kamil Ugurbil; Rainer Goebel; Essa Yacoub; Elia Formisano
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Influence of preparation time and pitch separation in switching of auditory attention between streams.

Authors:  Eric Larson; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Bayesian inference in auditory scenes.

Authors:  Mounya Elhilali
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2013

8.  Receiver psychology turns 20: is it time for a broader approach?

Authors:  Cory T Miller; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.844

9.  Asynchrony tolerance in the perceptual organization of speech.

Authors:  Robert E Remez; Daria F Ferro; Stephanie C Wissig; Claire A Landau
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-08

10.  Spectral completion of partially masked sounds.

Authors:  Josh H McDermott; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.