Literature DB >> 7642826

Grouping in pitch perception: evidence for sequential constraints.

C J Darwin1, R W Hukin, B Y al-Khatib.   

Abstract

Evidence is presented that sequential auditory grouping constraints apply to the perception of pitch. Experiment 1 shows that the pitch changes produced by mistuning the fourth harmonic of a 90-ms 12-harmonic 155-Hz fundamental complex tone are substantially reduced when the complex is preceded by four 90-ms tones at the same frequency as the mistuned component. Both the pitch changes and their reduction by the tonal sequence precursor remain when the mistuned component and the precursor are presented contralateral to the remaining components. Experiment 2 shows that reducing the level of the same mistuned component reduces the size of the pitch change, but only if the mistuned component is presented ipsilaterally. To the extent that adaptation can be equated with a physical reduction in level, this result provides further evidence against peripheral adaptation playing a significant role in the auditory grouping of harmonics in pitch perception.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7642826     DOI: 10.1121/1.413513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  19 in total

1.  Correct tonotopic representation is necessary for complex pitch perception.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Joshua G W Bernstein; Hector Penagos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Perceptual grouping affects pitch judgments across time and frequency.

Authors:  Elizabeth M O Borchert; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  A sound element gets lost in perceptual competition.

Authors:  Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Adrian K C Lee; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Harmonic segregation through mistuning can improve fundamental frequency discrimination.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  The singular nature of auditory and visual scene analysis in autism.

Authors:  I-Fan Lin; Aya Shirama; Nobumasa Kato; Makio Kashino
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  It all sounds the same to me: sequential ERP and behavioral effects during pitch and harmonicity judgments.

Authors:  Benjamin J Dyson; Claude Alain
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Measuring the perceived content of auditory objects using a matching paradigm.

Authors:  Adrian K C Lee; Steve Babcock; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-05-13

8.  Pitch discrimination with mixtures of three concurrent harmonic complexes.

Authors:  Jackson E Graves; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Neural correlates of attention and streaming in a perceptually multistable auditory illusion.

Authors:  Anahita H Mehta; Ifat Yasin; Andrew J Oxenham; Shihab Shamma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 10.  Cortical and Sensory Causes of Individual Differences in Selective Attention Ability Among Listeners With Normal Hearing Thresholds.

Authors:  Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.