Literature DB >> 8036112

Auditory induction: reciprocal changes in alternating sounds.

R M Warren1, J A Bashford, E W Healy, B S Brubaker.   

Abstract

When portions of a sound are replaced by a potential masker, the missing fragments may be perceptually restored, resulting in apparent continuity of the interrupted signal. This phenomenon has been examined extensively by using pulsation threshold, auditory induction, and phonemic restoration paradigms in which two sounds, the inducer and the inducee, are alternated (ABABA...), and the conditions required for apparent continuity of the lower amplitude inducee are determined. Previous studies have generally neglected to examine concomitant changes produced in the inducing sound. Results from the present experiments have demonstrated decreases in the loudness of inducers using inducer/inducee pairs consisting of tone/tone and noise/noise, as well as the noise/speech pairs associated with phonemic restorations. Interestingly, reductions in inducer loudness occurred even when the inducee was heard as discontinuous, and these decreases in loudness were accompanied by graded increases in apparent duration of the inducee, contrary to the conventional view of auditory induction as an all-or-none phenomenon. Under some conditions, the reduced loudness of the inducer was coupled with a marked alteration in its timbre. Especially profound changes in the inducer quality occurred when the alternating stimuli were tones having the same frequency and differing only in intensity--it seems that following subtraction of components corresponding to the inducee, an anomalous auditory residue remained that did not correspond to the representation of a tone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8036112     DOI: 10.3758/bf03207602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  6 in total

1.  Perceptual restoration of a "missing" speech sound: auditory induction or illusion?

Authors:  B H Repp
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-01

2.  Increasing the intelligibility of speech through multiple phonemic restorations.

Authors:  J A Bashford; K R Riener; R M Warren
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-03

3.  Multiple phonemic restorations follow the rules for auditory induction.

Authors:  J A Bashford; R M Warren
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-08

4.  Psychophysical evidence for lateral inhibition in hearing.

Authors:  T Houtgast
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Auditory induction: perceptual synthesis of absent sounds.

Authors:  R M Warren; C J Obusek; J M Ackroff
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-06-09       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Perceptual restoration of obliterated sounds.

Authors:  R M Warren
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 17.737

  6 in total
  9 in total

1.  Encoding of illusory continuity in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Christopher I Petkov; Kevin N O'Connor; Mitchell L Sutter
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Object-based auditory and visual attention.

Authors:  Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Binaural release from temporal induction.

Authors:  M Kashino; R M Warren
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-08

4.  Use of speech-modulated noise adds strong "bottom-up" cues for phonemic restoration.

Authors:  J A Bashford; R M Warren; C A Brown
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-04

5.  Evidence for independent time-unit processing of speech using noise promoting or suppressing masking release (L).

Authors:  Eric W Healy; Carla L Youngdahl; Frédéric Apoux
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Selective attention in normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Virginia Best
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-10-30

7.  Effects of frequency disparities on trading of an ambiguous tone between two competing auditory objects.

Authors:  Adrian K C Lee; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Selective spatial attention modulates bottom-up informational masking of speech.

Authors:  Simon Carlile; Caitlin Corkhill
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Low-level information and high-level perception: the case of speech in noise.

Authors:  Mor Nahum; Israel Nelken; Merav Ahissar
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 8.029

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.